THREAD: Thoughts on voting “glitches” and how I’d rig an election.

I hear many saying these glitches don’t matter & handfuls of votes won’t change the outcome of an election. While I understand the argument, I disagree.

Let me explain

If I were to rig an election I wouldn’t just pump new votes in. While that would be beneficial it wouldn’t be my first strategy. (Hold this thought)

I’d utilize “glitches” first. Why?

Say me & you are playing game & are tied at 4-4. A glitch occurs giving me 2 of your points.

This puts the score at 6-2 making a 4 point swing. That is much more powerful than just pumping more points in for me. (Hold this)

Now take this to an election, you can’t just switch too much otherwise it’d be obvious. Alabama likely isn’t going blue so probably SOL there.

Focus on battleground states (obviously). But how do you switch enough votes to influence outcomes without getting caught?

Disperse small amounts of “glitches”/switches across multiple counties. Increased % in blue counties and smaller % in (red) rural counties.

The key here is the small % in red/rural counties. As my mentor says a big % of a little is a little but a little percentage of a lot is a lot.

I focus on these rural areas too because I don’t expect them to get much attention, they’ll get a clear red win, BUT

I’ll make the margin more manageable while boosting my own votes.

These rural counties also are more likely to gloss over them, often less educated, & honest people that probably wouldn’t expect it...

By spreading it out across all these counties...

I create a larger swing in my favor all while making the margin smaller and boosting my numbers. Not only that I hedge my risk of getting caught by diversifying it across the counties.

Any instance seems rather small, out of place, and well meaningless cause...

my opponent still won that county and what’s a couple thousand votes in an election? Most counties are as predicted, nothing seemingly out of the ordinary. What dummy steals only 2000 votes?

Well I would. Again here’s why:

It doesn’t take mass collab to program a machine &

Say I take an avg of 2000 votes per county (some may be more or may be less) and in a state like AZ, with 15 counties that’d be 30k votes, a 60k swing & enough in a razor thin race to push me over the edge.

(AZ is at 12k margin)

Now I wouldn’t stop there...

maybe that’s not enough to guarantee

I’d further hedge with ballots cast from previous aliases, women’s maiden names, transgenders, women’s previous marriage last names, dead people, all that wouldn’t look back on their past.

Seems like random instances but enough votes if it got close that would help.

But what if I was just short of the vote or started sensing I miscalculated the % in certain swing states. You could have a safety net to halt the machines from working temporarily to adjust the % but

That’s risky for me bc you have to take a higher % of the incoming vote.

I would utilize “mailed in ballots” in allied counties as my safety net to boost the end outcome if absolutely needed. Knowing it’s plausible and understandable but to me is most risky.

Lastly,

The key to this election is razor thin margins. Makes things interesting.

Betting on the fact all these individually won’t bring much merit in court.

Now considering...

Reports of vote switching, live tv showing it, plus the voting system being tied to the DNC and the totem reported failing certification...this doesn’t seem too out there.

To further clarify the strategy behind the lower % in rural counties. Red votes would be higher, meaning I’d get more votes per percentage point than I would at the same percentage in a blue county.

If you haven’t check out this thread on how I’d rig an election.

#StopTheStael #maidengate #MaideGate #StopTheCheat #StopTheLies #stopthesteal

Another clarification the goal in this strategy is to keep every source of votes by themselves at a seemingly low and insignificant amount so they’re easily dismissed if discovered.

Here’s an interesting thread for something similar to what I mentioned above. https://twitter.com/michaeljburry/status/1326310808599420928

What further makes me believe something along the lines of my red/rural county % theory as plausible is that Trump outperformed in blue counties, yet didn't really lose ground in red counties... So how did he lose?

1 possible explanation is greater voter turnout (including mail in) but that means within the greater turnout Biden had to win those votes with a substantial margin/% to overcome.

I do not see that as probable because both sides would have had increased votes realistically &

(this my non scientific hunch) Biden's campaign lacked enthusiasm, rally turnout, & momentum, but most of all Trump actually performed quite well as previously noted.

Compare this with how the Senate & House races are going, voters didn't seem to respond to their platform.

So

All this together paints an interesting picture that I think is just as plausible.

It makes me think that something is going on & not only that but that Trump actually won...and by a LOT.

Here is an additional thought brought to my attention by @rcmogo.

Would 110% steal from the independents and at a much higher percentage than all the rest...because let’s be honest few pay attention.

& decent reason to believe there’d be plenty in this election prior. https://twitter.com/rcmogo/status/1327091546815127552