#SCOTUS now hearing arguments on #ACA challenge. DOJ shifted positions, will argue that the individual mandate is unconstitutional & the Court should invalidate entire ACA. The implications are deadly, millions of people would lose health coverage. Trump never had a backup plan.
So far Court is laser-focused on standing.
Solicitor General Wall arguing against a federal statute-opposite of SG’s normal job of defending federal law. SG also has to perform some gymnastics to justify standing by TX and states challenging ACA
Sotomayor: if Congress had simply phased out the mandate penalty over time instead of immediately zeroing it out, wouldn't that be a valid exercise of the tax power? Wall: Yes.
This is problematic for US and TX position that entire ACA needs to be invalidated.
And that’s a wrap. It appears there are 5 votes to find mandate unconstitutional but not 5 to find mandate inseverable, which would leave #ACA mostly in tact.
You can follow @maggykrell.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.