We identified babies with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospital through @BPSUtweet using active negative surveillance, with linkage to national testing data through @PHE_uk, @PublicHealthW, @P_H_S_Official, PICANet, @mbrrace, @NPEU_UKOSS to maximise case ascertainment
Headlines: SARS-CoV-2 infection in babies that received inpatient hospital care was very rare in the UK first pandemic wave: only 66 babies in the first 28 days after birth, incidence of 5.6/10,000 live births
Only 17 babies with SARS-CoV-2 infection were born in the UK to mothers with infection (~300 women with confirmed infection were known to have given birth over the same period @NPEU_UKOSS); this supports @WHO @RCObsGyn @BAPM_Official guidance to keep mother and baby together
The most common presenting signs in babies with SARS-CoV-2 infection were high temperature, poor feeding/vomiting, coryzal signs and respiratory signs
22 babies with SARS-CoV-2 needed breathing support (only 3 ventilated); outcomes were very good with almost all discharged home without ongoing problems (a few babies were still in hospital); no baby died of SARS-CoV-2 (1 sadly died of an unrelated condition)
Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was higher in Black and minority ethnic groups and in preterm babies - but was rare in all groups
Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection is uncommon, infection following birth to a mother with perinatal SARS-CoV-2 infection unlikely, and possible vertical transmission rare - this supports international guidance advocating keeping mother and baby together where possible
You can follow @DrCGale.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.