Affidavits, i.e., sworn statements are very meaningful when it comes to election fraud. Again they may not demonstrate scope and size of the fraud but they can point directly to perpetrators, specific acts of fraud and material conspiracies to commit election fraud

We have credible whistleblowers who have been directly threatened with prosecution by Detroit’s DA. Postal worker out of PA being told to collect ballots and bring them in to get a back-dated postmarks. Poll watchers observing 40k ballots coming in the back door at 4:30AM

3,000 criminal referrals and accompanying affidavits for out of state residents voting in Clark County NV and refusing to verify signatures for over 600k ballots. 70 affidavits from poll watchers who were not allowed to observe vote counting in PA.

Multiple court filings in Texas and sworn testimony regarding Dominion voting machine vulnerabilities. Sworn statements from election workers that Dominion staff pushed code to update the machines on the eve of the election.

These affidavits are very troublesome for Democrats. They are stacking up in an unprecedented mountain of election fraud evidence. They demonstrate the election fraud was widespread and material to the outcome of the election in at least 5 states.

You combine hundreds of affidavits from credible testimony, add multiple statistical anomalies that are less likely than winning the powerball lottery twice in a lifetime with clear violations of existing election laws you have a case for widespread election fraud.