The Economist article on the call to boycott 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics 
“Calls to boycott the event are stronger now than they were in 2008. In September more than 160 human-rights organisations called on the IOC to withdraw the games from Beijing.”
https://www.economist.com/international/2020/11/08/calls-to-boycott-the-beijing-winter-olympics-are-growing-stronger

“Calls to boycott the event are stronger now than they were in 2008. In September more than 160 human-rights organisations called on the IOC to withdraw the games from Beijing.”
https://www.economist.com/international/2020/11/08/calls-to-boycott-the-beijing-winter-olympics-are-growing-stronger
“The past few years, reports of human-rights abuses in Xinjiang + HK have spread around the world, have demonstrated that China is hardly receptive to international pressure. Hopes that more dialogue could lead China towards greater liberalisation have been all but extinguished.”
Official letters expressing concern have hardly worked.
As @nathanlawkc noted, a boycott would “send a clear signal that we are not going to follow the old path of appeasement, but we are going to be very assertive and proactive.” https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-hong-kong-dissident-urges-canada-allies-to-boycott-2022-olympics-in/ https://twitter.com/Stand_with_HK/status/1321466489363312645
As @nathanlawkc noted, a boycott would “send a clear signal that we are not going to follow the old path of appeasement, but we are going to be very assertive and proactive.” https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-hong-kong-dissident-urges-canada-allies-to-boycott-2022-olympics-in/ https://twitter.com/Stand_with_HK/status/1321466489363312645
Another issue are corporate sponsors:
“Sponsors are another campaign target. Brands are increasingly caught between demands in the West that they take a stance on issues of social justice, and a desire not to offend China and risk losing access to its lucrative consumer market.”
“Sponsors are another campaign target. Brands are increasingly caught between demands in the West that they take a stance on issues of social justice, and a desire not to offend China and risk losing access to its lucrative consumer market.”
China market access in a nutshell 

“The costs of annoying China are significantly higher than the costs of annoying people outside of China.”
“None of the major sponsors for 2022 have said that they are reviewing their contracts.”


“The costs of annoying China are significantly higher than the costs of annoying people outside of China.”
“None of the major sponsors for 2022 have said that they are reviewing their contracts.”