The poll these Corbynite extremists (“cherished” ffs) use as their central argument has been thoroughly and widely debunked: https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/factcheck-corbyns-claim-that-labour-antisemitism-numbers-are-exaggerated

(Spoiler: the rest is, at best, untrue to unreliable as well).
“unfailingly turned up to vote for parliamentary motions”. Not actually a thing, my little politics kibbitzers.
Accusations of Corbyn being antisemitism-adjacent only started after 2015? Nope. Just that no one was paying attention to our warnings before then.
“Institutional antisemitism” only used after Corbyn “won” the 2017 general election? Nope. Applied since at least early 2016.
Antisemitism declined in Labour after 2015? Nope. Fell among Labour voters. *Within* Labour we all know what happened.
Well done on the plaque and planning dispute, tho.
Thank flip we haven’t had the Wood Green and Finsbury Park shul nonsense included this time. They’re learning, I guess.
Antisemitism was only dealt with properly after all the antisemitism came to light after 2015? An argument so circular that you need Pi to at least 10 numbers to explain its stupidity.
You can follow @d4nf0x.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.