Read on Twitter
:)
I'm more interested in how self-consistency checks fail under the load of dissonance.
IF party reps (who may be assumed to have a vested interested in not being de-frauded by each other) have taken no issue via time-tested processes on ground, then there is no basis... + https://twitter.com/_benoux_/status/1324853054718574592
I'm more interested in how self-consistency checks fail under the load of dissonance.
IF party reps (who may be assumed to have a vested interested in not being de-frauded by each other) have taken no issue via time-tested processes on ground, then there is no basis... + https://twitter.com/_benoux_/status/1324853054718574592
... for claims of fraud by the inncumbent president.
And under such circumstances, any such claims by the presidential candidate MUST BE regarded as an attempt at fraud or delegitimization of the exercise of voter franchise. There is no other way to see it.
+
And under such circumstances, any such claims by the presidential candidate MUST BE regarded as an attempt at fraud or delegitimization of the exercise of voter franchise. There is no other way to see it.
+
The president is not standing alone by himself. He is formally representing a political party, which is understood to be representative of the people. Complaints of fraud or illegal practices in such cases, necessarily, flow from the ground up.
What boggles my mind ... +
What boggles my mind ... +
... is how "critical thinking" people get their heads knotted up over this.
Or, they are - sadly - no better at thinking about something or assessing what may be going on, in the face of results that they have problems accommodating THAN those that they deride at wanton.
Or, they are - sadly - no better at thinking about something or assessing what may be going on, in the face of results that they have problems accommodating THAN those that they deride at wanton.
