Thread: IT Industry Insider Says Reports Of “Glitches” In The 2020 Presidential Election Points To The Need For An IT Forensic Examination. @realDonaldTrump @SidneyPowell1 @TomFitton @T_S_P_O_O_K_Y @RichHiggins_DC @Sarah_Roberts_1 https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1324901123996741634

In a press statement on Friday Michigan GOP chair announced that 6,000 ballots meant for @realDonaldTrump went to Biden saying “The County Clerk called it a software "glitch."” The software used to tabulate the votes in this one county was also used in 47 other counties!

"Glitch" seems to be the catch word flooding reporting to explain recent #ElectionFraud findings. However after talking w/an expert, at length, I've discovered the word merely serves to provide cover for a larger shell game of intentional alterations to computer code.

An IT expert & former LEO who implements software for govt & private entities like GE says, “The word “glitch” is being used to make you think the computer system just had a hiccup/power surge. Leading you away from the possibility that the voting software was customized.”

In the IT industry all software delivered is known as the “vanilla” version which is computer code written (configured) based on industry standards or most commonly used functions in that industry.

Voting software allows the purchaser to configure the software according to the capabilities to the vanilla version. When the purchaser makes specific changes to the delivered software it is referred to as a “customization.”

When a technical person makes the customization changes to the delivered software, it is industry standard for them to make notations of date, changes made to code and initials of person making the changes.

The vanilla version of the voting software would be delivered with industry standard code for the parties; such Democratic, Republican, Independent, etc.

When the purchaser does the configuration, this is where they would enter the names of the candidates for each party. Joe Biden, Democratic candidate, Donald Trump, Republican candidate, etc.

The tabulation portion of the software code would be delivered as count 1 when selection is made for Democrat or Republican and so forth. In order for a glitch to happen, the delivered software code would have been customized to do a different tabulation for the counts.

Hypothetical scenario; after tabulation count of 100 for the Republican candidate, take the next 10 tabulation counts for Republican candidate and place that count to Democrat candidate count total.

Calling it a glitch does not explain counts transferring to a different candidate because someone had to have “altered” the software code to do it.

Prior to rolling out any new software or in this case an election, in the computer industry, there is testing and validation.

Test scenarios would be to mimic what happens when a voter cast their ballot. So if you estimate there will be 100k voting in a precinct, testing would be done at 85%.

When conducting testing, someone would either manually enter 85k votes or a technical person would write a program to insert votes in for the candidates. After entry of the votes, then you would compare the tabulation output to the data that was entered and verify the results.

The expert I spoke with recommends filing legal injunctions freezing use of the software so that a IT forensic inspection can be performed.

The culprits have had ample time to remove the customized code but said “a person who specializes in IT forensics would be able to see that the code has been touched.”

Problem to resolve:

MI GOP identified in one county 6k votes given to candidate A when in fact they were for candidate B. Co. Clerk stated the tabulating software glitched caused the miscalculation of the vote. Since then we have identified 47 counties using the same software.

REMEDY...

REMEDY (cont.)...