Read on Twitter
Thread:
1/ Did Trump and the GOP cheat by changing vote totals in areas where there are no paper ballots and they figured they could get away with it?
Of the additional votes in 2020 (over 2016), what % do you think Trump won? 50%?
Here's an overview showing his % of the gains
1/ Did Trump and the GOP cheat by changing vote totals in areas where there are no paper ballots and they figured they could get away with it?
Of the additional votes in 2020 (over 2016), what % do you think Trump won? 50%?
Here's an overview showing his % of the gains
2/ This data is based upon a thread by @DavidManel. It shows that Trump got either all of the increased votes in 2020, or about 83% of the increased votes. That's in counties that do not use paper ballots, so votes CANNOT be recounted. https://twitter.com/DavidManel/status/1323921182622732288?s=20
3/ But in a similar county that DOES use paper ballots (and thus the vote can be recounted to check for fraud), Biden got about 60% of the increased vote.
I've put his data into a Google Sheets spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1894qq7rkZjcmiBustpdJIkjzxKxZQvlxfi4KPTnrzA8/
I've put his data into a Google Sheets spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1894qq7rkZjcmiBustpdJIkjzxKxZQvlxfi4KPTnrzA8/
4/ Many voting machines have wireless modems that connect them to the Internet, use software that has not been publicly reviewed, and are easily hackable.
If fraud is suspected, only hand-marked paper ballots can be properly recounted and prove whether totals were changed.
If fraud is suspected, only hand-marked paper ballots can be properly recounted and prove whether totals were changed.
5/ Many counties have explicitly taken steps to ensure that recounting is NOT possible
Some counties encode a ballot into barcode, which humans can't read. During a "recount" they just rescan those barcodes but the original ballots have been destroyed so it's not a true recount!
Some counties encode a ballot into barcode, which humans can't read. During a "recount" they just rescan those barcodes but the original ballots have been destroyed so it's not a true recount!
6/ In conclusion, I think it's practically impossible that Trump truly earned 100% of the increased votes in those counties, especially given that he only got about 50% in counties where paper ballots were used and the vote can be verified
I think they cheated
Can we prove it?
I think they cheated
Can we prove it?
7/ A proper recount can't be done in those areas, as discussed.
But here's what we can do. We can have volunteers go door-to-door and perform a mock election in suspicious counties, then see if those results are anything near the official results.
But here's what we can do. We can have volunteers go door-to-door and perform a mock election in suspicious counties, then see if those results are anything near the official results.
8/ And we should do this in counties that aren't suspicious, so that we have more data and can compare "recountable" counties with "non-recountable" counties.
Then if the data shows the official results are blatantly wrong, it must be investigated.
Then if the data shows the official results are blatantly wrong, it must be investigated.
9/ Keep in mind that these are the kinds of unrealistic results that we see in corrupt foreign countries ("Glorious Leader Kim-Jong Un has won re-election with 99.8% of the vote!")
If votes are being changed, we must know. And if they are, what other votes were changed?
If votes are being changed, we must know. And if they are, what other votes were changed?
10/ What other surprising results have we seen? Were House or Senate seats stolen? Did your preferred local politician or important proposition lose? Did a corrupt one win?
If people have broken the law to commit this fraud, surely they'll continue to do it in future elections.
If people have broken the law to commit this fraud, surely they'll continue to do it in future elections.
11/ Will any of your votes ever really count?
This is a NON-PARTISAN issue. It may seem like I'm just attacking Trump, but that's just where the data is for now.
Any investigation must consider all corruption, regardless of party.
This is a NON-PARTISAN issue. It may seem like I'm just attacking Trump, but that's just where the data is for now.
Any investigation must consider all corruption, regardless of party.
12/ Every American deserves to have their vote count. It's one of the bedrocks of our society.
Anyone who claims to love America but attacks its foundations is in fact a traitor.
We must look into this immediately, even though the president may have been chosen.
Anyone who claims to love America but attacks its foundations is in fact a traitor.
We must look into this immediately, even though the president may have been chosen.
13/ It's tempting to let it all go since we're tired after months (years?) of this campaign, but if there is voting corruption it MUST be discovered.
Do it now.
Would you be interested to hear the results of looking into these literally unbelievable results?
Do it now.
Would you be interested to hear the results of looking into these literally unbelievable results?
14/ I'd actually love it if these results were investigated and proven to be correct. I'd much rather live in a country that is not corrupt, and where my vote is guaranteed to matter.
But with these ridiculous results, nobody be sure of that.
But with these ridiculous results, nobody be sure of that.
15/ Please take a look at the Google Spreadsheet; here's another link to it. Take a look at the "Proposal" tab for an idea of how we can have citizen volunteers investigate whether the results were accurate.
Please RT this if you're interested. Thanks! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1894qq7rkZjcmiBustpdJIkjzxKxZQvlxfi4KPTnrzA8/
Please RT this if you're interested. Thanks! https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1894qq7rkZjcmiBustpdJIkjzxKxZQvlxfi4KPTnrzA8/
16/ Special thanks to @DavidManel for the initial research, and for people like @jennycohn1 who have been following election security issues in detail for years. Jenny also had the observation that we could easily try to verify the results. They're both great people to follow.
