Brace yourself world, I have a THREAD about POLITICS, but it's okay because it's CANADIAN STYLE... (that's it for the caps, I promise)
I live in BC, Canada.

Back in March (early Covid) I asked my wife, “Hey, who’s the Premier of BC these days?” She didn’t know either.

I asked “What party is in power?”

We had to look up both. /1
If you have any sort of strongly held political ideology, you’re probably enraged by this (and a lot of other things!) but to me that’s a sign of a system working. /2
Turns out it was a coalition government.

I prefer coalition and minority governments and I often vote strategically for them.

Governing parties have to arrive at some sort of consensus to get anything done. It’s hard to wreck anything. /3
We had an election a couple of weeks ago. I voted (I always do) but I didn’t know who I was going to vote for until the day before.

Three days later I said to my daughter “Hey, who won the election?”

She told me. The result was acceptable.

In time I will forget it. /4
There’s a debate about whether Trump’s strong showing in this US election is a referendum on his character, with many of his supporters adamant it is not, and almost everyone else adamant it is. /5
It occurs to me that the average American probably has a more strongly held political ideology than those outside the US, certainly the average Canadian.

And absent any strong ideology, the character of the politician is higher on their principle stack. /6
I think that’s where a lot of the friction is. The character of an individual is important to most of us, but for some of us their ideology is more important.

I suspect the two-party system forces ideology up the stack. /7
In my life I have voted for four different parties across the whole political spectrum. That doesn’t include a vote accidentally placed for The Marijuana Party (true story). /8
I don’t define myself by any political ideology. I value a liberal’s kindness and inclusiveness, a conservative’s pragmatism and responsibility and a libertarian’s view that government shouldn’t always see itself as the solution to the problems it creates. /9
While my vote is up for grabs for almost any party, I have developed only one rule: I won’t vote for someone who is intolerant of their opponent’s point of view.

I don’t vote for angry politicians, even if I myself am angry about something. /10
But I count myself lucky to be in a parliamentary system where there have always been three or four parties that could form part of a government.

There’s always a level-headed choice or two to be found. /11
I can’t imagine not having that choice; having “Bernie or Trump” forced on me.

“Which of your angry grandpas do you want to have over for Thanksgiving dinner, honey?” /12
I’m not conflating anger and lack of character—I know they’re different— I’m just pointing out that, lacking an ideology, other things weigh more heavily in one’s voting decision. /13
Of course every ideologue will cite their opponent’s lack of character—it is the stick both sides beat each other with—and they drown out the open-minded moderates who truly value character over ideology. /14
It’s looking like Biden will narrowly win the presidency, with Republicans barely holding the senate and Democrats barely holding the house.

A person of good character at the top who can’t get much done without building consensus across party lines. /15
Some call this a divided government.

I call it perfectly Canadian.

Congratulations America.

(I now await your ideological rage.)

16/16
You can follow @blairenns.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.