DNC Concludes:
1. It's hearsay;
2. Plaintiff's claims are unsupported by the law;
3. Trump names the wrong defendants.
This is all an effort to stop vote-counting for no reason.
1. It's hearsay;
2. Plaintiff's claims are unsupported by the law;
3. Trump names the wrong defendants.
This is all an effort to stop vote-counting for no reason.
Judge now asking questions in #Michigan #Trump case...
Q1: While the SOS has a future function in the electoral process, other than giving directive and intervening in certain matters, the SOS doesn't conduct local elections, right? And doesn't count ballots, right?
Q1: While the SOS has a future function in the electoral process, other than giving directive and intervening in certain matters, the SOS doesn't conduct local elections, right? And doesn't count ballots, right?
Judge is asking whether Trump sued the correct party (i.e. should Trump have sued the local county officials instead of the Secretary of State?)
Trump lawyer says "there was another case where the SOS was added..." Judge Stephens says "yeah, but what was the issue?"
Judge Stephens: "I'm in a quandary here."
Trump lawyer: "Your Honor, I will try to assist..."
Trump lawyer: "Your Honor, I will try to assist..."
Judge Stephens: When Trump was asking for "meaningful access," you wanted this Court to order that each and every video be available for challenges prior to counting of ballots?
Trump lawyer: Yes, specifically that SOS makes the video available so challengers can observe.
Trump lawyer: Yes, specifically that SOS makes the video available so challengers can observe.
Judge Stephens: Asks if there's a statutory requirement that ballots must be segregated. (Answer, there isn't any). Stephens now says "we know the ballots were securely transported and processed..."
Trump lawyer: we just need transparency.
Judge Stephens: mmmm-hmmm.
Judge Stephens: mmmm-hmmm.
Judge Stephens: I understand that you want to observe the chain of custody as if it's a drug deal.
Trump lawyer concludes: We request that the challengers be able to access the ballots and be present as provided in Michigan statute; to be meaningfully available; and to review the video of that dropbox as required by statute.






In short:
1. SOS has already provided guidelines.
2. Trump sued the wrong party (should have sued the local officials, not the Secretary of State)
3. Suit filed at 4pm, relief is moot.
4. The evidence of any tampering was hearsay.
Request for Relief Denied.
1. SOS has already provided guidelines.
2. Trump sued the wrong party (should have sued the local officials, not the Secretary of State)
3. Suit filed at 4pm, relief is moot.
4. The evidence of any tampering was hearsay.
Request for Relief Denied.