Something that the left is really good at is twisting the truth, just enough to seem like they have a valid argument.

Example: How many times recently have you heard "there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud" to refute claims that the Dems would steal the election?

While, yes this is true on its face, it doesn't tell the whole story.

It is true that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

But does there need to be evidence of widespread voter fraud for us to be concerned?

I'd say no.

It is also true that there is plenty of evidence that there has been voter fraud, even if it isn't "widespread"

Many of the counties in the battleground states are decided by hundreds of thousands of votes.

A hundred votes here, and a hundred votes there can change a state.

So does there need to be evidence widespread voter fraud to debunk the claim that there will be fraud in the election?

No.

So they are intentionally deceiving us with their wording.

And we are letting them do it.