1/ This NYT piece about how China has blocked the search into the origins of #sarscov2 is bizarre. It explains how the PRC won't allow a real investigation, but DOES NOT EVEN MENTION the possibility the virus escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology... https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/02/world/who-china-coronavirus.html?referringSource=articleShare
In Hunt for Virus Source, W.H.O. Let China Take Charge

As it praised Beijing, the World Health Organization concealed concessions to China and may have sacrificed the best chance to unravel the virus’s origins. Now it’s a favorite Trump attack line.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/02/world/who-china-coronavirus.html?referringSource=articleShare
2/ And instead raises only one possible alternative: the straw man theory that "rumors and conspiracy theories, particularly among far-right and anti-China news sources, pushed the idea that Covid-19 had been manufactured in a Chinese laboratory."

NO.
3/ That's not the most likely alternative; the most likely alternative at this point - with NO evidence for a natural host, a natural virus very close to #sars-cov-2, or infection outside Wuhan - is that the virus leaked during gain-of-function experiments...
You can follow @AlexBerenson.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.