Twelver Shi'ism is based on mass-takfir against the vast majority of the #Sahabah (especially the prime ones).

#WorstTakfiriSect #Takfiris #Iran #Safavids

"The people turned on their heels and became Kuffar (disbelievers) after the Prophet's demise except for three: Salman (THE PERSIAN), Abu Dhar and al-Miqdad.”

(Shia) Reference: Al-Ikhtisas, pg. 6 by al-Mufid and Bihar al-Anwar, vol. 28, pg. 259 by al-Majlisi

This vicious Takfiri ideology is actually based on a plethora of Shia narrations that unequivocally state that all Sahabah (except a few) apostatised after the demise of the Prophet (ﷺ) for rejecting the alleged most important (!) pillar of Islam i.e. the myth of Wilayah/Imamah

A belief of mass-Takfir against hundreds of thousands of Sahabah or in the words of the renowned Shia scholar 'Ali al-Namazi a-Shahroudi who says in his book "Mustadrakat `Ilm-ul-Rijal" 1/67:

'We conclude from the LARGE quantity of [Shia] narrations declaring that all companions are apostates except three or four, that the GENERAL RULE for every companion who remained alive after the Prophet (ﷺ) and did not become a martyr in his time, is that they are APOSTATES...

...for placing the non-chosen leader in authority over the chosen leader (means 'Ali), or impious sinners for their shortcomings when it came to supporting him (means 'Ali), thus it is not possible to assume the reliability of any of them except through a specific divine text.'

There you go, the default Twelver position is that every Sahabi is a Kafir Murtadd until proven otherwise.

In Islam we have Husn al-Dhann even for an average Muslim of the 21st century, in Rafidism mass-Takfir against the Sahabah is the default position (then they have the audacity to speak of 'Takfiri-Vahhabis').

Some Shia propagandists have realised how utterly despicable this mainstream Twelver Shia towards the Sahabah is so in their desperation they try to argue (dilute the mainstream position) that 'some Sahabah repented later'...

...or that Shia narrations that speak of irtidaad do not intend irtidaad as in apostasy but rather irtidaad in the literal sense (as in turning back, leaving something).

These are all futile attempts, for even *if* their narrations would claim that the Sahabah 'only' turned severely misguided, they are still inherently anti-Qur'anic as they claim that the bulk of the Sahahah turned into some evil entity (the Qur'an doesn't say so) and for what?

For rejecting the dubious Twelver belief in the divine authority (Wilayah) of 'Ali (r).

This accursed belief of Wilayah comes with the ramification of mass-takfir against the noble Sahabah in specific and their followers, i.e. Ahlus-Sunnah in general and we have proven that here: