The genius of conspiracy theorist:

(thread)

Conspiracy-theorist has five major characteristics that distinguish it from anti-conspiracy and that sum up its genius.

Methodological advantage;
While the anti-conspiracy-theorist is mostly content to state the thesis (official gets along), the conspiracy theorist is forced to work, to go deeper into both the thesis and the antithesis.

While the anti-conspiracy-theorist has only to repeat the official thesis without needing to justify it, the conspiracy-theorist is forced to seek solid evidence to support his words and ends up acquiring a knowledge much broader than that of the anti-conspiracy theorist...

... who has limited his field of investigation because he only has to cite a "prestigious" source to win the battle for media power and the consideration of his peers.

The anti-conspiracy-theorist behaves like a prison guard where recalcitrant facts are yoked and beaten, out of sight, as long as their desire for independence and frankness has not been broken

The conspiracy-theorist is not entitled to authoritative arguments (for example, the invocation of a so-called "scientific consensus" by experts on epidemiology) and is subject to constant fire from critics.

.. he must become a goldsmith in his field in order to be able to counter an adversary who contents himself with repeating a clear message and brushing aside with the back of his hands contemptuously the arguments addressed to him.

Psychological advantage
The conspiracy-theorist has no a priori or taboos. The unthinkable is always thinkable for him. The conspiracy-theorist thus willingly navigates, by method and prudence, in the air of suspicion and does not trust anyone,

he treats everyone equally, the powerful and the weak; he listens to them with the same degree of attention, without seeking to please or displease their respective sensibilities. He wants to understand and not justify.

For his part, the anti-conspiracy-theorist is locked into the dogma of democratic infallibility, which automatically denies him a whole range of possibilities. He is psychologically incapable of imagining that our Democratic leaders can intentionally do evil.

Conceptual Advantage

The conspiracy-theorist offers intellectual tools to apprehend the world. He offers terms (whether or not he has constructed himself) to designate events, phenomena that are difficult to define or conceive.

Globalism, Atlanticism, Empire, Controlled Opposition, Deep State, Satanism, New World Order, Paradoxical Injunctions, Dogma of Democratic Infallibility, Media Crimes, Rhetoric of Disqualification..

..are all concepts, allowing us to get out of the stupor in which the progressive media-industrial complex keeps us, in order to better identify and understand the world in which we operate.

Moral Advantage

The conspiracy-theorist has an immense moral advantage over the anti-conspirator because he must show more courage and face the difficult social consequences of his words.

While the anti-conspiracy-theorist, like a good conformist who adores social normality, does nothing but relay and repeat the words of the media-political gospel which is served to him daily.

The anti- conspiracy-theorist willingly uses threat and intimidation to silence those who venture off the beaten and hackneyed paths: rhetoric of disqualification and emotional hysteria are his favorite tools.

Predictive advantage
What is striking, when you take stock of the conspiracy over the past two decades, is its incredible ability to be right, to predict what will happen.

Conspiracy theory is the great human, intellectual and political adventure of our century. If we want man to last in his human fundamentals, far from the trans-humanist and technicist promises that they want to impose on us without debate...

... it's time to assert what we are: a humanism.

"The essence of prestige is that it prevents us from seeing things as they are and cripples all our judgments. Crowds always, individuals more often than not, need ready-made opinions on all subjects.

The success of these opinions is independent of the amount of truth or error they contain; it depends only on their prestige. "
Crowd psychology
Gustave Le Bon
1895

End of the thread..