Read on Twitter
Vallance says the models produced “are not forecasts, they’re models which tell you how things can look. But they’re not forecasts and they should be looked at knowing that.
Hmm. I’m not sure much of the public would have looked at the models produced on Sat knowing that.
Hmm. I’m not sure much of the public would have looked at the models produced on Sat knowing that.
Indeed, if memory serves, I’m not sure that’s how they were presented.
Besides, I’m not even sure the Vallance distinction really holds in any meaningful way.
A model isn’t of any value if it doesn’t have some predictive power.
And if what Vallance is saying is right what is the value in showing them to the public?
Both Whitty and Vallance resiling from several of the slides they showed on Saturday. Emphasising that they say only several of the graphs were especially important and relevant. But as Jeremy Hunt is noting- in that case, why show them to the public?
