Read on Twitter
So @amitkgupta84 heard me claiming that Academe, Journalism, Big Tech and Entertainment are the four areas that have become both the most bizarrely ideologically intolerant *and* constitute our traditional sense-making apparatus.
So he directed me to this graphic from @Crowdpac:
So he directed me to this graphic from @Crowdpac:
So, for example, academics write about X. Reporters interpret findings on X for readers. Celebrities read these reports of findings on X in newspapers and record a group PSA. Then platforms decide who should be able to see and talk about this X PSA on-line.
Where X is arbitrary.
Where X is arbitrary.
For example, X could be:
China
Immigration
University Admissions
Vaccines
Wuhan Institute
Section 230
“Equity”
WTO
WHO
Climate
Biological Sex
Tax Policy
Where are the trusted central and neutral sense-making institutions that can counter ideological bias and activists? Nowhere.
China
Immigration
University Admissions
Vaccines
Wuhan Institute
Section 230
“Equity”
WTO
WHO
Climate
Biological Sex
Tax Policy
Where are the trusted central and neutral sense-making institutions that can counter ideological bias and activists? Nowhere.
I don’t find the Right providing the institutional answers here. I see the non institutional folks like podcasters as all we have. Which is pathetic and insane. Also dangerous, irresponsible and suicidal for an advanced nuclear superpower. 
