The Great Covid-19 Reset

View the full video here:

In late 2017, the EcoHealth Alliance, in conjunction with the NIAID and the Wuhan Virology Lab, published a paper titled, "Serological Evidence of Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus Infection in Humans, China."

The authors of said paper include Peter Daszak and Shi Zheng-Li, both who are involved heavily with the NIAID, USAID, PREDICT, and the Wuhan Virology Lab, in research involving the horseshoe bats Covid-19 is said to originate from.

In this paper, they acknowledge that the SARS outbreak in 2002-2003 originated in masked palm civets in wet markets in China. They bridged the gap between humans and the original carrier of the virus: Chinese Horseshoe Bats from Yunnan Province.

They identified six seropositive subjects that did not previously have SARS and did not previously show symptoms in the 12 months prior to.

Here's the kicker-

To identify the difference between affected and unaffected subjects, the scientists took samples from a control group.

That control group was in Wuhan, China.

You read that correctly. Wuhan.

Their logic:
"Wuhan, Hubei Province more than 1000 km away from
Jinning and where inhabitants have a much lower
likelihood of contact with bats due to its urban setting."

So, at the time, you have a group of people that show evidence for a Bat SARS-Related Coronavirus that did not have an animal in the middle to transfer the virus from host to human.

You also have Wuhan, China, as the control group.

A place where contact is unlikely to occur.

Miraculously, however, just two years after this paper is submitted and published, a novel Coronavirus emerges in Wuhan and almost immediately the wet market there is to blame. Images of the markets are spread far and wide.

Also conspicuously absent are suggestions that the SARS outbreak might be an accident resulting from a lab, despite there being a history of exactly that before.

As late at January 10, CEPI and the WHO are spreading the narrative that all "original" 41 cases of Covid in Wuhan originated from the wet market, despite that being completely untrue.

A couple of months before, China saw a huge spike in influenza-like illness over previous years.

Flu-like illness numbers for November were 156,205, an INCREASE of 129,359 over the previous year.

Flu-like illness numbers for December were at 1,199,771. An INCREASE of 1,069,329 over the previous year.

I plotted out the flu cases for the previous several years on a line graph. In October specifically and beyond, you begin to see the spike.

In the US, in week 40 of 2019, Influenza-like illness records began at a higher level than any previous flu season since 2009-2010, which was an anomaly in itself.

At the same time, China was already in hot water for covering up an outbreak of plague. You probably hadn't heard about that one. But it happened.

Simultaneously, leading up to the US flu season, Australia's flu season (opposite of ours due to being in the opposite hemisphere) was 7x worse than anything on record in over 18 years.

WHO influenza researcher, Ian Barr, said, "Definitely in terms of influenza seasons 2019 was the biggest Australia has had … it was very unusual. "I think one of the big reasons it was a such a severe season was that in most states, it was very prolonged."

Ultimately, what I'm getting at here, is that there was another analogous Coronavirus that had emerged in bats and transmitted to humans in the late 2010's that was documented thoroughly.

And despite the "wet markets" being, yet again, named the culprit, they weren't.

And despite there being three separate lab accidents related to SARS that we know of prior to, any suggestion that it might be even just an ACCIDENT was shut down and called preposterous.

Despite there being a paper in which WUHAN is used as a control group and shows 0-

seropositivity relating to the exact horseshoe bats in the cave in Yunnan that the new novel coronavirus came from. And the cited reason being that people in Wuhan were unlikely to come in contact with bats.

But as soon as Covid began, bats in markets were blamed.

Not to mention the funding that the NIAID, WVL, and Ecohealth Alliance all share to explore gain of function research in that exact bat coronavirus.

And despite Bill Gates insisting that "there's just no way to know for sure" we have known FOR SURE several times where SARS-

-originated. From those bats. And the only people messing with them are the NIAID, WVL, and Ecohealth.

So what gives?

And why hasn't this question been asked more and more often?

Why instead are we pushing into lockdowns and pretending this Coronavirus didn't exist before?

@threadreaderapp unroll please