The argument that most people r not aware of a text that proposes inhuman practices [and hence don't slam the text and do not point to the crap inside] misses how philosophy percolates to all those [through language,practices,beliefs and mores] who may not be aware of such texts.
One of the problems with "philosophy" has been its appropriation as some tool for elitist intellectual auto-eroticism that is beyond the grasp of ordinary mortals. I can not think of a more repugnant hubris by those who hold this view [humanities intellectuals].
In reality, #philosophy underlies all knowledge and fields/aspects of life & at a fundamental level it's one of the simplest things to grasp. But the self-proclaimed intellectuals deliberately obfuscate & run circles around people so as to keep philosophy out of reach of the many
Much of the rot one sees all around at all levels [race/gender/nationalism/caste/social order etc] stems directly from the philosophical tenets that are dominant at a point in time. Those are percolated far and wide. Every malaise can be traced to its philosophical foundations.
W/o getting into those fancy terms that intellectuals use, #Philosophy is about:
1. What exists? What is its nature?
2. How can we find out?
3. How do we chose? What code of values drive actions/choices?
4. What is aesthetics and beauty?
5. What are the foundations for rights?
1. What exists? What is its nature?
2. How can we find out?
3. How do we chose? What code of values drive actions/choices?
4. What is aesthetics and beauty?
5. What are the foundations for rights?
The corresponding terms used in rarefied circles are:
1. Metaphysics and Ontology
2. Epistemology, Logic
3. Ethics & Morals
4. Aesthetics & Pathos - including human beauty/goodness
5. Politics, Order and individual rights, laws
1. Metaphysics and Ontology
2. Epistemology, Logic
3. Ethics & Morals
4. Aesthetics & Pathos - including human beauty/goodness
5. Politics, Order and individual rights, laws
Take an eg., of an individual who:
1. Is never sure of what exists & what doesn't.
2.Has no way of finding out anything abt anything.
[Just 2 out of 5 dimensions]
You can possibly draw up an image/profile of such an individual and then infer the answer to remaining 3 dimensions.
1. Is never sure of what exists & what doesn't.
2.Has no way of finding out anything abt anything.
[Just 2 out of 5 dimensions]
You can possibly draw up an image/profile of such an individual and then infer the answer to remaining 3 dimensions.
In rarefied circles the terms: post-modernism, relativism etc. Or post-truthism. Or revisionism.
Can you actually imagine the horrors that can and do follow based on a particular way of viewing things along just 2 of the 5 dimensions I mentioned above! Think about it.
Can you actually imagine the horrors that can and do follow based on a particular way of viewing things along just 2 of the 5 dimensions I mentioned above! Think about it.
"Metaphysics" [see above] is abt first principles on what exists, its nature, origin etc & includes Ontology [What exists].
"Metaphysics scientist"???? Words have meaning - Do not use words the meaning of which you do not know. https://twitter.com/AnupamPKher/status/1334035880638439425?s=20
"Metaphysics scientist"???? Words have meaning - Do not use words the meaning of which you do not know. https://twitter.com/AnupamPKher/status/1334035880638439425?s=20