Read on Twitter
Can the authorities and media start sharing daily death counts and infection counts and hospitalisation counts from every other disease and cause, both for this year and past years so we can make an informed judgement about how covid deaths fare against others. I need context.
And can they start reporting daily number of cases of other infectious and non infectious cases? I hear TB, flu, diabetes and cancer are quite big public health concerns
Iâd also like a reason why no other disease has ever been covered in such a manner, especially with the intention of instilling fear and panic not hope. How expensive is the covid PR campaign? Could money from billboards, caller tunes, mask police etc be better spent?
I donât understand the focus on âcase numbersâ when âcase numbersâ include probable (not confirmed) cases, âasymptomatic carriersâ aka healthy ppl, 97% false positives from #PCR test, and other metrics which make this statistic irrelevant and incorrect #casedemic
All countries have different testing mechanisms, definitions, protocols and effectiveness. If everyone is testing to different degrees and in different ways, then how are âcase numbersâ even comparable? Thereâs no baseline #casedemic
If you test more people at a given point in time, youâll find more cases. So a countryâs case count right now is not even comparable to its count 6 months ago. The testing rate is different both times. Weâre not controlling or accounting for this. #casedemic
If anyone wants to show case numbers have gone up or gone down, they can simply increase or decrease testing to produce a desired result. Specifically to show high #casecount as a reason to justify #lockdowns.
At any given point, since other tests like #antibodytests etc are being used, the case count also includes a backlog of cases or people who have apparently already ârecoveredâ. The numbers arenât meaningful without all this context.
#KaryMullis The inventor of the PCR test himself has said that it cannot be used to determine the existence of spread of an active virus or a pandemic. He said it can be used to find almost anything in anyone. He died towards the end of last year. #casedemic
Itâs imperative that we talk about these facts in mainstream, open forums. Why is there no room for healthy, informed, #democratic debate? We have a right to participate in conversations about our health, bodies, minds, lives and livelihoods. #medicalfreedom
What about the facts mentioned in here? https://www.bitchute.com/video/5GKa5Xf5ZQf3/
And here
If youâre not going to take time to go through the details and get into healthy discussions with others about it, then make sure you have a few sources who can keep you abreast from multiple perspectives. Shutting out all opinions other than the mainstream narrative is dangerous
My thoughts exactly! https://twitter.com/adamafriyie/status/1329404132633976832?s=21 https://twitter.com/AdamAfriyie/status/1329404132633976832
âDeaths in which tests are awaited with the presence of symptoms will be recorded as suspected deaths, while those testing negative but have symptoms will be mentioned as clinically-epidemiologically diagnosed COVID-19, the guidance stated.â 
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/icmr-issues-guidance-for-appropriate-recording-of-covid-19-deaths-to-create-robust-data/article31555423.ece
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/icmr-issues-guidance-for-appropriate-recording-of-covid-19-deaths-to-create-robust-data/article31555423.ece
This amazing doctorâs credentials should speak for themselves https://twitter.com/simondolan/status/1329359618976395266?s=21 https://twitter.com/simondolan/status/1329359618976395266
