Hang on, got one...

No, "everything" is *not* "a chemical". https://twitter.com/ChemistCraig/status/1311743131814068224

Let's go through it.

"Is 'law' a chemical?"

"No. Of course not!"

"Okay, then everything that is not an abstraction is a chemical."

"Is a 'human' a chemical?"

"No. Of course not! A human is made of chemi-"

"Okay, then everything that is not an abstraction nor an emergent object is a chemical."

"Is a 'photon' a chemical?"

"No. Of course not! But-"

"Okay, then everything that is not an abstraction nor an emergent object but is still matter is a chemical."

"Is a 'proton' a chemical?"

"No. Beca-"

"Okay, then everything that is not an abstraction nor an emergent object but is still matter but condensed into atoms is a chemical."

So we're actually left with "Everything that is not not a chemical is a chemical", which is a far less impressive statement.

And that's before getting on to how it fundamentally misunderstands the objection it's meant to refute.