Today we have @DrRonWald from St Mike's presenting on "Phosphate control in the dialysis population: Settling the controversy" at @OttawaRenal Nephrology Grand Rounds

Follow along as we live tweet
Dr Wald from @UnityHealthTO starts off with clinical vignettes
- patients with high PO4, controlled pTH - how high do you go on adding binders?
- patient with excellent PO4 and 16 binders pills/day complains about pill burden
Do we have any evidence for either of them?
high PO4 does induce vascular calcfication
from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11009570/ 
may cause a phenotypic switch
or this schematic from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27282935/  in @Kidney_Int

that's the basic science - lets turn to clinical data now
From Geoff Block in @JASN_News - observational data from 2004
https://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/15/8/2208

Note U shaped curve
Or see this from @SuetoniaPalmer in @JAMA_current as of 2011 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21406649/  a systematic review of all the observational data
But is it just residual confounding or a causal relationship?

Excellent pont from @DrRonWald
Despite no trials, the @goKDIGO and other groups give recommendations for PO4 control that go way beyond the clinical evidence eg https://kdigo.org/guidelines/ckd-mbd/
Hilarious

@DrRonWald calls this the 'great phsophate bypass'
restricting dietary PO4 for patients is not without harm

See where PO4 restriction ranks from Patient Priorities via @Manns2Manns @AndreasLaupacis in https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24832095/  in @cjasn
Even intensified dialysis improves the numbers

but should we ask someone to ask them to change their life for better numbers?

This is a question raised from the above patient priorities paper as well
What about binders?
huge pill burden

From @SuetoniaPalmer et al in @AJKDonline https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27461851/ 

short follow up and no reduction in mortality from trials so far
Pill burden is a priority for patients
duh
In the US, we spend 1.5 Billion annually on binders with no evidence of mortality benefit
Numbers from @AJKDonline https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29195858/ 
Followed with an excellent editorial
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29224957/ 

Well said!
OTOH

This: not well said from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22797178/ 
Sure: we do need some data about feasibility

this lead to the TARGET trial, publishe din @CJASN https://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/12/6/965 from @DrRonWald and @lastwalsh
In the TARGET trial
Intensive arm: Aim for < 1.50
In the liberalized group, a serum PO4e concentration of >6.20 mg/dl (2.00 mmol/L), but rescue for >7.75 mg/dl (2.50 mmol/L), was targeted

Liberal arm: most patients came off the binders!
with beautiful separation of PO4 in serum

from https://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/12/6/965
@DrRonWald walks through the questions for the next step they faced
HD or HD and PD/CKD
How do we manage other MBD features
What kind of outcomes do we want?

Shows @song_initiative
We also want to have trials have better generalizable

RCTs in dialysis population
- more GN, less DM
- lessmortality
compared to real world data

See from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31282924/ 
You can follow @hswapnil.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.