For context, my city has very low community spread: test positivity is 0.16%. Public high schools are fully remote, middle schools will be remote until at least November, and elementary schools are using a hybrid approach. (Many private schools are opening full-time in person.)
On Mondays and Tuesdays, my 6-year-old will be learning remotely while cohort A attends school in person. He can't handle remote learning on his own and both parents work, so he'll probably be with a paid sitter, likely one that's shared with at least one other family.
On Thursday and Friday mornings, he'll be learning in person at school as part of cohort B, in a reduced class size of about 10 kids. Those afternoons, he'll be in paid childcare at the school in a group of 26 kids, including kids from other cohort B classrooms.
On Wednesdays, he'll be in paid childcare at the school, again with a group of 26 kids, but this time mixing with kids from *both cohort A and cohort B.* (He'll be doing "remote" learning during this time, but the staff can't assist beyond helping the kids turn on their devices.)
Hybrid allows distancing in the classroom. But here's the result: in one week, my kid will have interacted with 1) the teacher and kids in his class, 2) childcare staff, 3) kids in other cohort B classes, 4) kids in cohort A, and 5) a sitter and other families on remote days.
There are obvious educational, health, and equity costs to kids doing most of their learning remotely. But setting those aside for the moment, it's hard to see how the hybrid model makes sense even from an infection prevention standpoint.
You can follow @JuliaLMarcus.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.