The ActBlue headlines are wildly dumb, but I did a bit of digging just to see what was going on there. In reality <5k transactions (not donors) where the contributor was listed as "unemployed." Of those, just 69 were amounts of $100 or more. 15 $200+. 8 individuals gave $1k+.
The ActBlue headlines are wildly dumb, but I did a bit of digging just to see what was going on there. In reality <5k transactions (not donors) where the contributor was listed as "unemployed." Of those, just 69 were amounts of $100 or more. 15 $200+. 8 individuals gave $1k+.
The ActBlue headlines are wildly dumb, but I did a bit of digging just to see what was going on there. In reality <5k transactions (not donors) where the contributor was listed as "unemployed." Of those, just 69 were amounts of $100 or more. 15 $200+. 8 individuals gave $1k+.
The ActBlue headlines are wildly dumb, but I did a bit of digging just to see what was going on there. In reality <5k transactions (not donors) where the contributor was listed as "unemployed." Of those, just 69 were amounts of $100 or more. 15 $200+. 8 individuals gave $1k+.
The ActBlue headlines are wildly dumb, but I did a bit of digging just to see what was going on there. In reality <5k transactions (not donors) where the contributor was listed as "unemployed." Of those, just 69 were amounts of $100 or more. 15 $200+. 8 individuals gave $1k+.
You get a similar number of hits for "unemployed" in the occupation field, but likewise mostly tiny amounts. And of the 5 large transactions, four are the same person.
You get a similar number of hits for "unemployed" in the occupation field, but likewise mostly tiny amounts. And of the 5 large transactions, four are the same person.
You get a similar number of hits for "unemployed" in the occupation field, but likewise mostly tiny amounts. And of the 5 large transactions, four are the same person.
You get a similar number of hits for "unemployed" in the occupation field, but likewise mostly tiny amounts. And of the 5 large transactions, four are the same person.
You get a similar number of hits for "unemployed" in the occupation field, but likewise mostly tiny amounts. And of the 5 large transactions, four are the same person.
"Not employed" is the motherload here, which is triggered based on the binary radio button on the front end asking "Are you employed? Y/N" Figure that's capturing mostly retirees, which themselves make up another 4M as a self-IDed group. More high dollar giving, as you'd expect.
"Not employed" is the motherload here, which is triggered based on the binary radio button on the front end asking "Are you employed? Y/N" Figure that's capturing mostly retirees, which themselves make up another 4M as a self-IDed group. More high dollar giving, as you'd expect.
"Not employed" is the motherload here, which is triggered based on the binary radio button on the front end asking "Are you employed? Y/N" Figure that's capturing mostly retirees, which themselves make up another 4M as a self-IDed group. More high dollar giving, as you'd expect.
"Not employed" is the motherload here, which is triggered based on the binary radio button on the front end asking "Are you employed? Y/N" Figure that's capturing mostly retirees, which themselves make up another 4M as a self-IDed group. More high dollar giving, as you'd expect.
"Not employed" is the motherload here, which is triggered based on the binary radio button on the front end asking "Are you employed? Y/N" Figure that's capturing mostly retirees, which themselves make up another 4M as a self-IDed group. More high dollar giving, as you'd expect.
Why doesn't WinRed have a comparable number? Probably because they don't have the same binary. Instead, you can click "I'm Retired" to bypass the required employer/occupation field. So similarly situated donor just coded differently. (I will say I prefer the WinRed version.)
Why doesn't WinRed have a comparable number? Probably because they don't have the same binary. Instead, you can click "I'm Retired" to bypass the required employer/occupation field. So similarly situated donor just coded differently. (I will say I prefer the WinRed version.)
Why doesn't WinRed have a comparable number? Probably because they don't have the same binary. Instead, you can click "I'm Retired" to bypass the required employer/occupation field. So similarly situated donor just coded differently. (I will say I prefer the WinRed version.)
On AB, if you answer "no," that's it, you don't enter anything else, and you're listed as not employed. If you select yes, it provides the employer/occupation field, and steers you back to "no" if you don't have anything to enter. Retirees split pretty evenly on how to respond.
On AB, if you answer "no," that's it, you don't enter anything else, and you're listed as not employed. If you select yes, it provides the employer/occupation field, and steers you back to "no" if you don't have anything to enter. Retirees split pretty evenly on how to respond.
On AB, if you answer "no," that's it, you don't enter anything else, and you're listed as not employed. If you select yes, it provides the employer/occupation field, and steers you back to "no" if you don't have anything to enter. Retirees split pretty evenly on how to respond.
On AB, if you answer "no," that's it, you don't enter anything else, and you're listed as not employed. If you select yes, it provides the employer/occupation field, and steers you back to "no" if you don't have anything to enter. Retirees split pretty evenly on how to respond.
You can follow @LPDonovan.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.