Questionnaire: What do you see as *core* to Bitcoin and what as *ancillary*?

Below is a long list of questions, but I think this is going to be interesting.

Please answer only if you actually hold BTC or otherwise care about it!

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin without proof-of-work?

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin without the current 2.3MB block size limit?

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin without reasonable time to finality? (say: 1-2 days for medium-sized txns)

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin if both L1 and any trustless L2 would be unaffordable for you to use, and the only alternative is to interface via traditional banks?

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin if some users (but not you) are censored from using it at the protocol level?

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin if you (as part of a minority) are censored from using it at the protocol level?

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin if a bug inflated the current supply by 1m BTC and there is no clean way to roll back the chain? (e.g. because it's not immediately discovered)

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin if a bug inflated the current supply by 1k BTC and there is no clean way to roll back the chain? (e.g. because it's not immediately discovered)

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin with 0.1% perpetual inflation?

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin without the entire current Bitcoin Core developer team?

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin with 0.01% perpetual inflation?

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin if some users (mostly exchanges) were subject to occasional double-spend attacks?

Bonus question 1:

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin if 50% of the supply were tokenized on other public blockchains?

Bonus question 2:

Would Bitcoin still be Bitcoin if >90% of the supply were tokenized on other public blockchains?