Too few scientists recognize how our values and cultural suppositions influence the questions we think to ask, the hypotheses we consider plausible, and the areas of inquiry we believe are worth pursuing. Diversity is good for science. https://theconversation.com/women-have-disrupted-research-on-bird-song-and-their-findings-show-how-diversity-can-improve-all-fields-of-science-142874
This reminds me of the emergence of interest in female mate choice - which proved tremendously important in animal behavior - that coincided with second-wave feminism in the 70s and 80s.
As well as the more contemporary example of queer biologists (like my student @tweetingmouse) revisiting assumptions about same-sex behavior. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-019-1019-7
This is also a strong practical (and moral) argument for involving marginalized groups as partners in research that explores their experience. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/bioethics-crispr-indigenous-genome/