1. Has the "act" of making laws only to challenge them over legality or constitutionality become a deep state tactic to aquire mass volumes of tax payer dollars?

Congress passes laws or POTUS signs an E.O. then, MILLIONS of tax payer dollars are paid to law firms to debate them.

2. Very often, the big law firms employed to debate these new laws are owned by and/or employ family members of, congressional or government officials. The deep state is funding itself with this charade. The script decides who contests and who supports the new rule. Then, debate.

3. Like high school or college debate teams, but getting paid millions to do it. Not only that, playing this charade gives the illusion that there really is opposing forces in government...all while hiding that "connected families" are putting our tax dollars in their pockets.

4. Is it all just a greed perpetuated scandal with no real intent to make better laws or safeguards for American citizens? We need protections put in place that ensures the "friends and family plan" stops right now. Absurd laws and suits against them would drop overnight.

5. Excessive and inordinate lawsuits will taper off once friends and families of government officials lose their free ride.

No more ignoring conflicts of interest. No more frivolous contests of laws or Executive Orders simply to line a law firm's pockets with tax payer dollars.

6. And, what about the judges? Rulings are made specifically to extend cases, to enable costs to increase the bill to the American tax payer. And then, after all that, the judge hands down a predetermined ruling that he's been scripted to give since the beginning of the case.

7. It's total corruption. It's subterfuge. It's slight of hand, deception, illegal, immoral and should be stopped immediately. And, all this practice has made them very good at contesting @realDonaldTrump's legitimate and necessary Executive Orders. But, there's more.

8. Part of the illusion that has been created by this repetitive facade is that contracted attorneys and low level courts have the authority to contest Congressional laws and Executive Orders, and the proposed reaction is that or the President MUST abide by the courts rulings.

9. That was never the intent. The problem is, the media has monopolized on covering these dog and pony show cases where a high dollar lawyer and a paid-off judge create a scenario that LOOKS like they have the power to overrule the President of the United States of America.

10. America has come to believe what they've been seeing is reality when in fact the ACT has been played for the sole purpose of making the Republic reach this conclusion; this process is actually the standard in the United States of America. https://www.pogo.org/analysis/2018/02/president-v-courts/

11. Past presidents directly defied the courts. Congress has challenged the courts too. Mandates are unclear that either absolutely abide by lower court rulings. Only the Supreme Court has been given that authority, but even they have been challenged. https://archive.attn.com/stories/14672/what-happens-if-trump-tries-defy-courts

12. The original framework says courts should rule fairly and without partiality, thus making accepting their rulings plausible. But, what happens when the judiciary has been weaponized against a President or even against an entire political party? There must be a correction.

13. No matter what, because of the rarity of the electorate refusing court orders, any defiance by Congress or POTUS will be extraordinary. It will be considered a crisis by some, victory by some, and a necessary precedent by others. It will be historic no matter what happens.

14. That's why this thread is so extremely important. Questioning the immoral abuse and fraud of money making schemes to challenge laws and orders must br exposed. Exposing politicized and weaponized processes in the courts is our duty as Patriots!

#GetAwaker

God bless,

-End