Right off the Bat:
Well John, to call this case normal where the prosecution has hidden Brady & Giglio materials, altered document, lost documents, failed to fulfill bench ordered document production, and frame a completely innocent man.

Your political bias and hackery is noted you douchebag
Here the douchebag hack claims the Gov't or Flynn has cited a case to support their claim that the uncontested MTD divests a court of Article III jurisdiction.

Well no shit Sherlock no judge has ever pull this sort of stupidity in the past so there would be no case to cite
This hack goes off on tangents about Trump pressuring Comey to lay off Flynn, just amazing what this piece of shit won't resort to.
This guy is a clown "presumably" is never a word you want to use in a legal argument of guilt, the only thing ever presumed is innocence stupid.
And here's the kicker

"The only coherent explanation for the Government’s exceedingly irregular motion as well as its demonstrable pretexts is that the Justice Department has yielded to a pressure campaign led by the President for his political associate."

He's off the rails
Here is the Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae in open court accusing the POTUS of obstruction of Justice in writing on the record in a legal brief.

They should disbarr the son of a bitch post haste but they will likely give him a million dollar book deal
This is interesting, look down at the authors of this brief.

David O'Neil
Why is this significant? O'Neil is the lawyer for Sally Yates.
Yates is a material fact witness to the FBI/DOJ misconduct to Flynn & the Carter Page as far as that goes. This brief directly serves the interests of O'Neil's client.

Talk about conflict of interests @SidneyPowell1
You can follow @RoscoeBDavis1.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.