Follow the URL to a letter from 2012. Clearly the science is not settled & recent physical papers on the sensitivity of climate to [CO2] & those showing underlying historical oscillations support that conclusion.
Those with funding supporting the AGW story will not meet in -> https://twitter.com/drwaheeduddin/status/1304292709142802433
open debate for this reason. All offers are rejected & are downplayed as irrelevant by the public - "We know!". This could be easily settled if Drs Michael Mann & Katherine Hayhoe would agree to such a discussion on camera if possible. The audience would need to be balanced ->
between factions & on their best behaviour. If the science is known the AGW glamour pusses should easily trounce those pions arguing against it! No?
This may not be in the interests of many Green govt policies, but it will at least show that massive public expenditures over ->
decades are pointless. Also, both India & China refuse to join this club & are not bound to any pollution reduction agreement. The UN can't argue for such a policy AND increased funding of 3rd world economies by the West. This slight of hand should be publicly admonished ->
You can follow @MannockDavid.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.