1/8) Soros's home country (Hungary) has passed a law against him and his tactics...  Prime Minister Orbán elaborated that the nation must: "...fight against an opponent which is different from us. Their faces are not visible, but....

2/8)....are hidden from view; they do not fight directly, but by stealth; they are not honorable, but unprincipled; they are not national, but international; they do not believe in work, but speculate with money; they have no homeland, but feel that the whole world is theirs."

3/8) Soros's team challenges Hungry's Law stating that the Hungarians are antisemitic because they are stopping his non-governmental organizations from bringing Muslim immigrants into Hungry.

3a) Why is it if you disagree with what someone is doing, if they are ethnic or a different...

4/8)....race, they hide behind that saying that
the opposition is antisemitic or islamophobic etc.

5/8) So I will ask again, how is not believing in a human rights violation against female children islamaphobic? 

How is believing that Sharia Law should not be imposed in America islamaphobic? That is common sense. What if a muslim and an american are in a car wreck, which...

6/8)....law rules? If an american and a muslim are business partners and the partnership desolves, which court takes precedent? If a muslim and a non-muslim divorce, which law takes precedence over property division and child custody?

Is there any country in the world that...

7/8)....has 2 different sets of law in it?

If so, how is it working out for that country?

If Sharia Law is allowed in America then we will have to allow everyone that comes to America to live outside our laws. Do we want that many forms of law/government inside the USA?

8/8) Where would it stop?