Often it is better to be the big fish in a small pond

Monopolizing small ponds is highly profitable

Let me show you why:
Let's say you're a baker and you want to start a bakery

There are two towns you can start your bakery in. Neither of them have a bakery right now

One town is 3000 people, the other is 30000

Which one is better?

You'd think the bigger one right?

But you'd be wrong
See if you go for the smaller 3000 people town, you saturate the market with your one bakery

You'll never have to worry about any competitors outcompeting you because it's just not profitable to open a second bakery in such a small town

Profitable + secure business
The 30.000 people town might sound better, but there is no way you can serve 30.000 people with one bakery

So soon a second one will spring up, and a 3rd etc

Eventually you have 10 bakers in that town and you'll have the same amount of customers as you would in the small town
Here's the kicker though

Opening a second bakery in a 3000 people town means only 1500 potential customers

Opening an 11th bakery in a 30.000 people town means around 2800 potential customers

So a 30.000 people town can support more than 10 bakeries. Probably even 12-15 bakers
The logical conclusion is that it's better to be the big baker in a small town, than a small baker in a big town

Small niches with almost no competition are often much more profitable than big generic markets where you'll have tons of competitors
This isn't just true for business, it's also true for dating

It's much better to be the most eligible bachelor in a small town

Than to be somewhere in the middle of the pack in a big city

(Unless you just want to skank around & not date seriously)
You can follow @NielsKnk.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.