thread where we find the value of e, because I'm too lazy to look it up

I'll start us off: e = 5

me: Alexa what's a number that's less than five

Alexa: Here's something I found on the web. According to ___.com: Five.

Okay, cool. We're going with -3.
e = -3

e = 1

e = 3

everybody we're doing great!!
This is probably a significant milestone!

e = 2

e = 2.5

e = 2.75

e = 2.625

This one was 50/50 for the first eight votes! how exciting. everybody is doing so well, and we should all be proud!

e = 2.6875

wow gosh *pats roof of mathematical constant* :o

e = 2.71875

e = 2.703125

I think we got another digit!!

e = 2.7109375

e = 2.71484375

I'd like to spend a moment in acknowledgement of the 13% of people who believe that e is greater than 5 or less than -3. We're all doing our best

e = 2.716796875

good morning!!

e = 2.7177734375

the sky is burning but we can still find e!

e = 2.71826171875

I think we got another digit maybe :o

e = 2.718505859375

e = 2.7183837890625

e = 2.71832275390625

great job everybody!! only probably some more digits to go!

e = 2.718292236328125

shout out to this person especially

e = 2.7182769775390625

e = 2.71828460693359375

we're now past the precision for google's featured result for "value of e", allegedly

e = 2.718280792236328125

e = 2.7182826995849609375

e = 2.71828174591064453125

this is just like seti@home

good job everybody, we're off to a great start again

we're now past the default precision for bc -l

so I made us a shell alias instead.
the k stands for kate

okay!!

e = 2.718282222747802734375

e = 2.7182819843292236328125

we're now past the default precision for printf's "%f" format. Good work everybody! we're more accurate than C

e = 2.71828186511993408203125

Are you sure?

on that exciting cliffhanger, I am signing off for the evening. we shall resume tomorrow for the thrilling resolution!