Hi, @nytimes. Trump aides saying they take pride in breaking the law should be the headline, not the 21st paragraph.

Some obscure producer helping should be the 21st paragraph, not the headline.
Hi, @nytimes. Trump aides saying they take pride in breaking the law should be the headline, not the 21st paragraph. Some obscure producer helping should be the 21st paragraph, not the headline.
Hi, @nytimes. Trump aides saying they take pride in breaking the law should be the headline, not the 21st paragraph. Some obscure producer helping should be the 21st paragraph, not the headline.
Does anyone believe for one goddamn second that if Hillary Clinton was president and John Posesta and Jen Palmieri were bragging about breaking the law, the New York Times would bury that in paragraph 21 and headline some irrelevant volunteer?
In paragraph 26 the @nytimes tells us that the producer it hyped in the headline is in fact quite obscure.

So to sum up:

HEADLINE: OMG Apprentice producers are helping!

PARAGRAPH 21: Gleeful lawbreaking

PARAGRAPH 26: Nobody’s ever heard of the “producer.”
In paragraph 26 the @nytimes tells us that the producer it hyped in the headline is in fact quite obscure. So to sum up:HEADLINE: OMG Apprentice producers are helping!PARAGRAPH 21: Gleeful lawbreakingPARAGRAPH 26: Nobody’s ever heard of the “producer.”
In paragraph 26 the @nytimes tells us that the producer it hyped in the headline is in fact quite obscure. So to sum up:HEADLINE: OMG Apprentice producers are helping!PARAGRAPH 21: Gleeful lawbreakingPARAGRAPH 26: Nobody’s ever heard of the “producer.”
In paragraph 26 the @nytimes tells us that the producer it hyped in the headline is in fact quite obscure. So to sum up:HEADLINE: OMG Apprentice producers are helping!PARAGRAPH 21: Gleeful lawbreakingPARAGRAPH 26: Nobody’s ever heard of the “producer.”
Just an absolute trash newspaper when it comes to politics.
Breaking the law: a very savvy re-election strategy https://twitter.com/alaynatreene/status/1298444764837228545?s=21 https://twitter.com/alaynatreene/status/1298444764837228545
Yes, by definition Trump believes that Trump’s convention will appeal to voters. That isn’t a useful insight. A useful bit of journalism would be *telling people if this is legal or appropriate*

https://twitter.com/alaynatreene/status/1298461849562865664?s=21 https://twitter.com/alaynatreene/status/1298461849562865664
Oh come on. https://twitter.com/elainaplott/status/1298458705189642240?s=21 https://twitter.com/elainaplott/status/1298458705189642240
You can follow @jamisonfoser.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.