. @pbhushan1

1. Under which law a Supreme Court can withdraw the powers of Sitting High Court Judge & if there is any precedent, is that not illegal & unconstitutional?

2. Justice Karnan wasn’t a Police officer to investigate & collect all the evidences against corrupt Judges.. https://twitter.com/pbhushan1/status/1296731214716395521

.. to produce them in the court to substantiate his allegations.

3. Justice Karnan had complaint to @PMOIndia. PMO should have investigated the matter, instead it referred to Supreme Court. Whether the Supreme Court is an investigating authority?

4. Whether the allegations in..

.. amounts to contempt & does it fall in any of the definitions of contempt in Contempt of Courts Act, 1971?

5. Under what circumstances the Supreme Court can constitute 7 Judges Bench & does it require a reference Judgment? Whether sitting in 7 was illegal?

6. Whether the...

... independence of Judiciary means independence of High Court as well & punishing the sitting High Court without getting him removed by Parliament amounts to the violation of fearless & independent High Courts?

7. Whether punishing a High Court Judge & sending him to jail for..

..six months amounts to an interference with the Parliament’s power under Article 217 proviso (b) read with Article 124 (4) of the Constitution?

8. Jail sentence to Justice Karnan amounts to a breach of Constitution & abridgment of Parliament’s power by Supreme Court to remove..

.. Judge & whether such a Judgment by Supreme Court is constitutionally permissible?

9. High Court Judge has a security of tenure until s/he attains 62 years of age. Supreme Court illegally violated this constitutional guarantee of tenure of a High Court Judge by sending Judge..

..jail. This was the most blatant violation of Constitution by Supreme Court.

10. Sending a private complaint/letter of allegation to Prime Minister is not a publication contemplated under section 2 (c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 & therefore, Justice Karnan’s action..

.. not at all contempt.

11. When Supreme Court illegally took cognisance of alleged contempt & decided to hear the matter against a Constitutional functionary, a sitting High Court, it failed the Constitutional machinery.

12. Because, the Supreme Court failed & paralysed..

.. the Constitutional machinery, the High Court Judge left with no option but to pass certain orders restraining Supreme Court 7 Judges. Under the existing circumstances, the orders passed by Justice Karnan were neither illegal nor bad. He passed those orders out of compulsion..

13. How Supreme Court committed grave & unpardonable wrong:

1. It failed the constitutional machinery.

2. It deprived the Parliament from its exclusive power vested by Article 217 proviso (b).

3. It deprived the tenure of office to a High Court as guaranteed by Article 217(1).

.. 4. By sentencing Justice Karnan, the Supreme Court violated the Basic Structure of Constitution, i.e. independence of judiciary. By sentencing a Judge, it undermined the fearless character & independence of High Courts. Remember, High Courts are not subordinate to Sup Court.

.. 5. By trying a contempt of court case against a High Court & sentencing him for six months, the Supreme Court created the Constitutional crisis unprecedented in the Histrory. It was a grave act of misuse of Jurisdiction by Supreme Court.

6. Justice Karnan’s allegation were..

in connection with any pending case nor was there any prohibitory order by Supreme Court.

14. In this saga, the Supreme Court misunderstood its contempt jurisdiction, contempt power & misused it.

15. Tell me in which country of the world a person can be held for contempt for..

.. for complaining against a Judge to a superior Constitutional authority/Prime Minister.

15. And also tell me, in which country of the world a person can be held for contempt of Court for criticising a Judge or Court which is not in relation to a pending case or disobeying..

.. a prohibitory order or for non compliance of any direction/writ or order?

Mr Bhushan

Justice Karnan was ridiculed, condemned & let down by the system or by the influential class because he was not a Brahmin/upper caste man & he was from the OBC/SC/ST communities.

Shameful!