2/ For a multidisciplinary field, #sciencediplomacy has ignored entire fields and disciplines that implicitly embed SD or have been studying for a long time. It‘s also been portrayed as the history of “great men” of science and of diplomacy, and neglected non-Western dimensions.
3/ It also portrays scientists as “inherently good-natured” & a rosy picture of intl science cooperation for “the betterment of humanity.” I too had this naïve view as a biochemistry student -but this ignores a history of scientific colonialism, imperialism, racism, mysoginy, etc
4/ Now, after 6 years training 1000s of people in #sciencediplomacy around the world, I will say that most young scientists I have encountered do genuinely hold these aspirational views of science.
5/ They are dissatisfied with the systemic issues of academia and see SD as a vehicle to use their science to positively impact society (based on 1000s application essays I‘ve read). And guess which scientists are the most interested in SD? Women and underrepresented groups.
6/ This means many young scientists have come to see SD as an escape route from academia. But as @tim_flink illustrates, an understanding of STS, geopolitics, IR, history, economics, sociology, security, law & global governance is essential to gain a critical perspective.
7/ A handful of countries offer #scipol fellowships placing PhD scientists in govt to learn on the job for a year or two. More of these programs should be created around the world & should invite more social scientists. I wrote this report with @AAAS_STPF https://www.aaas.org/resources/connecting-scientists-policy-around-world
You can follow @margagual.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.