Read on Twitter
So? And what are you trying to prove you child molester?
-"There are 9 hadith books, yet they follow the same isnad. Checkmate, Muslamics!!!!"
1-This is just a single pathway for a single hadith, there are many...many hadiths that are exclusive to to a certain hadith book. https://twitter.com/delventotime/status/1296461531274784768
-"There are 9 hadith books, yet they follow the same isnad. Checkmate, Muslamics!!!!"
1-This is just a single pathway for a single hadith, there are many...many hadiths that are exclusive to to a certain hadith book. https://twitter.com/delventotime/status/1296461531274784768
So I am not sure what point he is trying to make by mentioning that there are 9 of them.
2-There are way more than the 9 books. The 9 are just the major ones.
3-A single hadith having multiple isnads, i.e. corroborating reports, strengthens it.
2-There are way more than the 9 books. The 9 are just the major ones.
3-A single hadith having multiple isnads, i.e. corroborating reports, strengthens it.
The fact that hadith scholars went as far as to collect all the chains of a certain hadith, weak chains and strong ones, shows the great strength and reliability of this science.
The fool doesn't stop here! Oh no he doesn't!
The fool doesn't stop here! Oh no he doesn't!
He knows that these chains are very strong and they clearly lead a perfect path. So what does he try to do? Cast doubt upon the last one in the chain, the one who narrates from the Prophet (peace be upon him) directly:
Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him.
Abu Hurairah, may Allah be pleased with him.
Shias, Quranists, Murtads, and every enemy of our religion love to attack Abu Hurairah for two main reasons:
-He is considered as a "front face" of sorts to the knowledge of hadiths.
-He has narrated a very large portion of them, so invalidating him would be quite useful to them.
-He is considered as a "front face" of sorts to the knowledge of hadiths.
-He has narrated a very large portion of them, so invalidating him would be quite useful to them.
So they can attack Islam freely, or follow their whims and desires without hadiths they don't like holding them back.
What is his source for his claims against Abu Hurairah?
"LOL type his name"
that he was a
"new kid"
and that he "narrated 5374 hadiths"
What is his source for his claims against Abu Hurairah?
"LOL type his name"
that he was a
"new kid"
and that he "narrated 5374 hadiths"
Firstly, he stayed close to the Prophet (peace be upon him) for THREE entire years. That is not a short amount at all, and is enough for him to collect hundreds of thousands of hadiths. Keeping in mind that all his sayings and actions create "hadiths". Look at this for example:
That number that he gave is, while although possible as explained above, quite misleading. The number "around 5374" hadiths refers to the isnads of these hadiths, and not the individual hadiths themselves (the matn). If we went by that, then around 1300 would be a closer number.
And you know what's hilarious about these 1300 hadiths? A GIANT portion of them were also narrated by different companions!
John here is the perfect example of Dunning-Kruger effect. Dude thinks that he smart, and thinks outside of the box! He thinks that he is outside the flock of sheep! He thinks he is special...but in the end:
He is just a joke.
He is just a joke.
Oh, and just so you guys know:
Abu Hurairah was trusted by all the major Sahabah, even Umar (may Allah be pleased with him).
Abdulrazaq narrated that Umar used Abu Hurairah as a governor for the eastern region of Arabia once. Then he offered him the position again, but he refused
Abu Hurairah was trusted by all the major Sahabah, even Umar (may Allah be pleased with him).
Abdulrazaq narrated that Umar used Abu Hurairah as a governor for the eastern region of Arabia once. Then he offered him the position again, but he refused
