But I want to take a moment to step back and talk about the broader implications of the report and how we value energy efficiency. Utilities traditionally value EE based on what resources it helps defer in the future. 3/x
But if the only resources we are building are carbon-free does that mean EE doesn't contribute to decarbonization b/c it only displaces carbon-free resources?
I'd argue no.
4/x
We've now reached a point where new clean resources are cheaper than existing dirty resources. Now more than ever we can invest in both renewables and efficiency serve both new load and displace old, dirty, expensive resources still on the grid. 5/x
Allow me to visualize this for y'all. Ignoring all the many benefits of EE and boil it down to energy value and avoided emissions. If a utility (or consultant) assumes that EE is avoiding new wind instead of their existing coal plant they can cut the value of EE in half! 6/x
Even worse is when utilities use LMP as a proxy for the value of EE. This is where this work ties into UCS's work on self-scheduling. B/c now utilities will assert that EE has a negative value when LMP is negative while charging customers for their self-committed coal. 7/x
You can follow @electronecon.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.