

We @jryancollins & Hugues Chenet argue that central banks & financial supervisors must take precautionary action to manage environmental risks beyond climate change.
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/publications/2020/aug/managing-nature-related-financial-risks
[THREAD]
Nature loss encompasses a highly complex set of phenomena:
multiple interconnected threats
unprecedented irreversible impacts
complex system dynamics, e.g. tipping points
subject to 'radical uncertainty'
huge challenges for financial modelling





It is not clear that methodologies for information disclosure & quantitative risk estimates (e.g. Taskforce for Nature-related Financial Disclosures) can be sufficiently advanced in the time remaining for transformative action. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jun/01/sixth-mass-extinction-of-wildlife-accelerating-scientists-warn
Nature-related impacts are already occurring in the short-term, and well within financial and supervisory time horizons.
e.g. pollinator losses limiting crop production
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/08/loss-of-bees-threatens-us-crop-yields/
e.g. pollinator losses limiting crop production


The climate crisis and broader environmental breakdown are intimately interconnected. Attempts to manage climate risk will be *underestimating* true impacts unless nature-related risk is also taken into account.
source: Steffen et al. 2015 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/347/6223/1259855

The financial sector is not only *exposed* to nature risks, but also *contributing* to them, through its lending, investing & advisory activities.
@DNB_NL estimate Dutch FIs responsible for nature loss equal to an area 1.7x larger than the Netherlands.
https://www.dnb.nl/en/news/news-and-archive/dnbulletin-2020/dnb389169.jsp
@DNB_NL estimate Dutch FIs responsible for nature loss equal to an area 1.7x larger than the Netherlands.
https://www.dnb.nl/en/news/news-and-archive/dnbulletin-2020/dnb389169.jsp
The failure of financial actors to cease facilitating harmful business practices risks ‘locking in’ future impacts.
Nature-related risks, therefore, may emerge endogenously from behaviours within the financial system itself.
@Global_Witness https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/forests/money-to-burn-how-iconic-banks-and-investors-fund-the-destruction-of-the-worlds-largest-rainforests/
Nature-related risks, therefore, may emerge endogenously from behaviours within the financial system itself.
@Global_Witness https://www.globalwitness.org/en/campaigns/forests/money-to-burn-how-iconic-banks-and-investors-fund-the-destruction-of-the-worlds-largest-rainforests/
We argue for financial authorities to use a precautionary approach to managing nature-related risks:
Markets poorly manage systemic, endogenous risks
Precise quantitative estimates may not be feasible...
... and waiting for them delays onset of urgent action
Instead...



Instead...
We suggest that central banks & supervisors determine – with govts – clearly harmful activities that cannot be financed in order to avoid critical natural tipping points.
Such an
exclusionary list
can then determine eligibility criteria within monetary & prudential toolkits.
Such an


This requires financial authorities to embrace more of a 'market-shaping' role.
Central banks are not exogenous to the system. They are active market participants whose decisions influence market outcomes. A lack of intervention is itself a policy choice that carries risks.
Central banks are not exogenous to the system. They are active market participants whose decisions influence market outcomes. A lack of intervention is itself a policy choice that carries risks.
The full report can be found here: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/public-purpose/publications/2020/aug/managing-nature-related-financial-risks
[END]
[END]