Read on Twitter
Steph better than Dame....but yall acting like it's a cliff between a 67 TS% Prime 2016 Steph and a 63 TS% in 2020 Dame.
That's 4%. The efficiency is close enough.
*Note Steph did this with 2 allstar teammates. Meaning he got better looks. Dame team was riddled with injuries.
That's 4%. The efficiency is close enough.
*Note Steph did this with 2 allstar teammates. Meaning he got better looks. Dame team was riddled with injuries.
Dame also iso'd at a 18% frequency to Stephs 10% frequency in 2016.
Before Steve Kerr Steph never shot over 61 TS. Since Kerr his lowest TS (beside this year) was 62.4 and at peak 67.5 TS.
Imagine Dame next to Klay, Green, KD in that system of movement.
Dont sleep on Dame
Before Steve Kerr Steph never shot over 61 TS. Since Kerr his lowest TS (beside this year) was 62.4 and at peak 67.5 TS.
Imagine Dame next to Klay, Green, KD in that system of movement.
Dont sleep on Dame
Passing wise, Dame and Steph are a wash imo.
Athleticism is clearly Dame.
Dame has won 3 playoff series including a WCF app w/o a allstar teammate with mult 50+ win szns.
Steph never made a WCF w/o allstar help and won just 1 PO series, and had 1 50 win season b4 a allstar.
Athleticism is clearly Dame.
Dame has won 3 playoff series including a WCF app w/o a allstar teammate with mult 50+ win szns.
Steph never made a WCF w/o allstar help and won just 1 PO series, and had 1 50 win season b4 a allstar.
Dame > Steph isnt a bad take if we keep in context Steph has had:
-Much better help which helps his efficiency, and reduce his fatigue in the playoffs.
-Much better system
-A system facilitated to get guys easy buckets
-And even had a higher usage in 2016 than Dame had this yr.
-Much better help which helps his efficiency, and reduce his fatigue in the playoffs.
-Much better system
-A system facilitated to get guys easy buckets
-And even had a higher usage in 2016 than Dame had this yr.
