The argument that Harris is not a natural born citizen should not be called a "birther conspiracy," imo.
I think of "birtherism" as a factually inaccurate conspiracy theory, like with Obama.
The claim about Harris is actually much worse. 1/3 https://www.newsweek.com/born-us-kamala-harris-eligible-become-vice-president-opinion-1525031
I think of "birtherism" as a factually inaccurate conspiracy theory, like with Obama.
The claim about Harris is actually much worse. 1/3 https://www.newsweek.com/born-us-kamala-harris-eligible-become-vice-president-opinion-1525031
It's not a factual claim about just one person, Obama.
Rather, it's a legal theory that, if adopted, would not only strip Harris of citizenship, it would strip hundreds of thousands of Americans born to immigrant parents of citizenship.
Rather, it's a legal theory that, if adopted, would not only strip Harris of citizenship, it would strip hundreds of thousands of Americans born to immigrant parents of citizenship.
It's a theory that also amounts to voter suppression, as it would render all those people ineligible to vote.
If we still want to call it birtherism, we should acknowledge that it's of a different kind.
It's birtherism on steroids.
If we still want to call it birtherism, we should acknowledge that it's of a different kind.
It's birtherism on steroids.