I agree with Rupesh, who I respect a lot as an analyst.

Next time around the subs will get equitized. A full repayment as suggested in the failed proposal is dreamland folks.

THREAD

1/ https://twitter.com/Everest_UK/status/1294285757251715074
Lets get one thing clear: We are currently not involved as my PM poos in his pants. It is also more difficult as I work from the US and on dif sits.

Anyways, the asymmetry of the sit is mind boggling atm. 1Y Front End CDS: c100pts upside (sub recovers 0%), c-5pts downside.

2/
What Rupesh has not mentioned in his note is that there is very little to no cross ownership b/w senior and sub, ie this takes away the dynamic of self bail-out, ie that seniors have an incentive to roll in order to bail-out their own sub position.

3/
Rupesh's argument would get even stronger if one considers the following: I have heard from several sources now that the refi deal has gone that south that banks needed to sniff around hardcore bears in order to get new money/lenders into the deal.

4/
Without success!

This is almost a death sentence for this deal, as it is inherently dependent on new money/new lenders IMHO.

Why? Whilst some existing lenders would probably agree to a refi (albeit coupon is big question mark with suggested NPV cuts super aggressive)...

5/
...the huge majority of them want to cut their exposure drastically. Hence the need for new lenders. Again something I have heard not only from one source.

Everyone that would ever consider Lowell as a long is already in the structure folks!

END
PS: Neither higher coupon is possible, nor repayment of SUN with anything else. Esp not at close to par lvls.
You can follow @ValueHunter11.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.