After reading a James Dean bio which directly explores his sexuality (pretty solidly arguing that most of his sexual relationships were with men), I’m reading one now that tiptoes around it all together, even obfuscating his long-time affair as a teen with an adult male pastor.
Yet even this book is full of quotes about what a ‘sensitive’ child he was, and how ‘effeminate’ he seemed to the other kids, and how ‘it’s funny, he never had girlfriends in high school, I guess he just was more interested in focusing on his extracurriculars...’
Btw I read the second (David Dalton’s The Mutant King) years ago. I’m rereading because it’s full of excellent information and does a really beautiful job exploring his work and craft, even if the author has clear biases regarding how he chooses to present Jimmy’s private life.
The former, Boulevard of Broken Dreams by Paul Alexander, does a much better job handling Dean as a person but arguably not quite as well at capturing him as an artist and what made him a legend as Dalton’s book. So they’re complementing each other nicely.
The number of times the no-homo biography of James Dean casually mentions how he moved in with yet another older male agent, producer, or director, as if that’s something that just happened to young, hot up-and-coming actors they weren’t fucking.
Men in power in the entertainment industry were notoriously just extremely generous, letting young actors live in their homes, and providing them with food, money, and helping them get work, y’know?
This sketch of a bullfighter that James Dean drew (he was FASCINATED by them) is *alone* proof he wasn’t straight.
A straight 20-year-old boy drawing that bulge in 1951? Okay!
You can follow @robwillb.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.