Hey #amquerying writers, there have been a handful of agencies popping up (listed at end of thread) recently claiming to want to represent voices typically unheard in publishing.
While this is a great sentiment, experiences shared by founders and a lack of sales / client history make it difficult for this goal to be achieved.
Degrees and internships, while great, do not mean you can run an agency. I've addressed the why here: https://twitter.com/Megan_Manzano/status/1294654679687856128?s=19
And by not having applicable experience, even with the best intention of wanting to help underrepresented voices, it's hard to do so.
Gatekeeping and racism in publishing is a systemic issue. Getting books into editors hands often involves connections.
More importantly, you want to come ready to fight for your clients when on submission, when negotiating a contract, all through a book's publication and extended to their career.
You want to keep them from being exploited.
You want to keep them from being exploited.
And even before the contract stage, you want to know how to edit / best provide direction for a client's work.
There are rules for going on sub. Often times, if an editor passes on a book, you can't submit it again.
If an author gets new rep later on, it has to be with a brand new book.
This is time and creative effort a writer has to put in.
If an author gets new rep later on, it has to be with a brand new book.
This is time and creative effort a writer has to put in.
Learning as you go, as the founder of an agency, can harm any writer's career - good intentions aside.
So with all of these points in mind, here are the agencies:
Weaver Literary
GP Literary
Weaver Literary
GP Literary
Always do your research, writers! If something feels off, it's okay to go with that feeling and dig deeper.
I also know publishing relies heavily on a network and info is not always out there, hence the reasoning of this thread.