Bill Priestap did the SSCI briefing in Feb. 2018, Priestap is in a real bind, because he had first hand knowledge that all that crap in that briefing was bullshit and did it anyway. That may draw some serious heat legally.

There were three representatives in this briefing to the SSCI in Feb 2018, So Bill Priestap, Andrew McCabe & Scott Schools were the three that sat there in that briefing and lied their asses off, knowing full well the truth, giving cover for Mueller and company.

Here's another interesting observation. Priestap's FD-302 is still under seal, that's means one of two things or both.

That 302 is evidence in an ongoing criminal investigation and/or it's Grand Jury evidence.

Next James A Baker, I mentioned him yesterday in this thread. Comey's right hand man & Clinesmith's direct supervisor.

Justin Shur after making all those extrajudicial statements claims publically, kinda changes his tone, verifies cooperation by client https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/john-durham-grills-former-top-fbi-lawyer-hired-by-twitter-report

Now last night Graham for Gowdy that there were 4 people at the FBI briefing on Steele's PSS in front of the SSCI in February 2018.

I'm sticking with my original claim of Priestap, McCabe, Schools, but my guess is the 4th was Clinesmith, he wrote the briefing notes.

One of the forks in the road of this evidence trail is leading towards Team Mueller, that why Weissmann was screaming like a bitch yesterday. Clinesmith wasn’t working for the FBI on June 19, 2017, when he altered that CIA email by that date Clinesmith was part of Team Mueller.

And it was Mueller’s crew who were using the renewals of the FISA warrant on Page that Clinesmith decided to commit forgery, to insure that FISA got renewed.

Both the FBI & Mueller weaponized the FARA Act to obtain surveillance illegally. Like I said yesterday FARA in criminal.

This could get ugly for all of team Mueller and his band of 13 angry Democrats. This conviction is well into Mueller's scam on the Taxpayers calling it a investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 that they really have no hard evidence of. CrowdStrike's word? Yeah sure

The ICA was a complete joke made up of a mash up of the CrowdStrike Report and the Dossier, both equally a Boston Steamer.

No one other than Crowdstrike looked at that server and that's just not acceptable when it comes to probable cause and predicate to do this level of spying

Here's something that never added up, and no one seemed to question it.

According to CrowdStrike, they were notified on 5/5/16 by the DNC that they thought they were compromised and Crowdstrike claimed to have captured and removed the hack within hrs of installing Falcon.

Here's the problem more than half of the emails were dated after CrowdStrike installed Falcon and couldn’t have been taken before they were on the job. So their claim right there is bullshit, why hasn't that ever been pointed out? Their story doesn't line up time wise.

So how could the Russians have stolen over 44,000 emails with almost 18,000 attached files while CrowdStrike was monitoring them on the DNC system?
It just doesn't line up timewise with their bullshit claims.

How could anyone have stolen that many files, 1.9 TB of data in 87 seconds over the internet from some remote location without Falcon having any record of the files exiting the DNC’s system or without the NSA having any trace of this traffic across the backbone?

Bullshit

Assange said the DNC emails hadn’t come from the Russians or any other state-affiliated actors & the former British ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray insisted he’d been the middleman between Assange and the source, who was a disgruntled DNC insider. https://go.shr.lc/2KuelW8 

They suppress the hell out of these facts because is kills the Russia hoax claims dead. In turn that kills the whole Russia collusion crap and the entire lie they used just to spy on Trump during the campaign and then after he was sworn into office.

Mueller made no attempt to question either Murray or Assange, I mean one claimed to have direct knowledge about the source of the DNC emails while the other is the only person in the world would know with 100% certainty. They never got near that because it would pop their balloon

Back in 2016 General Flynn had been adamantly insisting to Trump that the Russian DNC hack claim by CrowdStrike was complete bullshit.

How do you fight someone that knows the truth? You discredit them, so trapping him in a conviction of lying to the FBI discredits him...

Shawn Henry’s old FBI boss Mueller did everything in his power to destroy the three most prominent people pushing the idea that the Russian DNC hack was bullshit & based on Henry's testimony we know CrowdStrike never had any evidence even occurred. They speculated 100%

Or just flat out lied which is more like it. That is where the Russia Collusion nonsense was born and it grew from there with ZERO evidence to back it up.