Big scandal.

So that HK activist who has a Chinese-sounding name and a Chinese man profile pic is a fictitious personality, just like the ones exposed by @thedailybeast before.
He was quoted and published by so many mainstream media and they all didn't check his identity?
I literally can't believe it because, you know, you'd thought editors would at least check if the person was real. And if it's just a pen name, he'd at least told them and they would print it upfront.
Also, can we expect these media to withdraw or at the very least inform their readers that the guy is a fake?
It would be a huge blow to their own credibility no doubt. But if they leave at it is, I'd discount everything I read on them re HK protests henceforth.
"As Kong Tsung-gan, my character is my writing."

I felt deceived for believing @KongTsungGan was a real person in the past.

Hey, but at least he is amitting now it's just a "character".
This fake Chinese identity story just keeps on giving ppl nasty surprises.

Not only Kong Tsing-gan is fake, he has interviewed another fake identity invented by himself.

https://www.thestandard.com.hk/section-news/section/11/221905/Unmasked-Chinese-fake-quits-HK---but-keeps-phony-persona
I'm utterly disgusted and enraged by this guy. I did a little research and found out who that previously unknown Chinese person was.
TFW you have not only faked an identity but also appropriated the pic of a June 4th victim.

What a monster!
I sort of understand why media got screwed by “A gay girl in Damascus” because it’s in Syria and they didn’t have enough access to information and were willing to take whatever available out there.
But this time is Hong Kong, where 100s of MSM reporters and editors are based.
No one bother to check if the person exist? No one try to meet him in person? No one has any slightest doubt of his identity even after the Standard published a story a few months back alleging it’s a white man behind the fake Chinese persona?
FFS.
And what’s with @HKFP threatening to sue the Standard for publishing that expose?
They have published articles with bylines from Kong Tsing-gab as well as Brian Kern. Did they not know the former was a fake identity invented by the latter (or as they later admitted “pen name”)?
Why didn’t they warn their readers that’s not a real Chinese person behind that byline?
And most mind-boggling of all, why would they knowingly let a white man use a Chinese-sounding name for byline (and the pic of a June 4 victim as their profile pic)?
I have a lot of respect for @HongKongFP because they are one of the few media which reported the the sexual misconduct story of then FCCC president Jon Kaiman.
That was brave.

They now have tonnes of explanation to do.
https://m.facebook.com/nury.vittachi/posts/10158720433246214
Whatever you think of @TheGrayzoneNews previous stories, this is rock solid.
Hats off to @MaxBlumenthal for finding out clues from these audio interviews most ppl have missed.
Now, shall we talk about the other Chinese identity allegedly invented by the same white guy behind Kong Tsung-gan's persona?

The Standard mentioned Xun Yuezang was interviewed by Kong Tsung-gan and I tried to find the articles.

Guess what, Kong Tsung-gan took them offline.
Ask him about the other allegedly fake Chinese identity "Xun Yuezang" as well.
Also, why did he delete his interviews with "Xun Yuezang"? https://twitter.com/NatalieWong601/status/1294918023271219201?s=20
You can follow @LunaNLin.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.