Landmark UK free speech case redacted in legal text book for A-level students because it might cause offence... This case was key in helping define how free speech is policed in UK - on an issue specifically made a matter (by government) of public political debate @WeAreFairCop https://twitter.com/robjessel/status/1292234316760715264

I gave written evidence in this case and was in court for the judge's summary. This case tested the parameters of acceptable political discourse on social media in UK and the police's role in overseeing those parameters. It needs to be understood and considered - not censored.

This is the written judgement. Worth reading in full (some of my evidence summarised from paragraph 247). You might disagree with the decision. You might find it changes your opinion on the issue. You won't know unless you read it (unredacted), right? https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/miller-v-college-of-police-judgment.pdf