Recently, after the @couriermail opted to publish the names, faces and social media posts of two young women of colour after they breached COVID19 restrictions, I collated some examples of the racist abuse they'd received in this thread. CW abuse https://twitter.com/KetanJ0/status/1288731771178307591
The incredible quantity of comments of these posts was so huge. I used http://exportcomments.com  for a few of those tweets, but put aside some time to do a more thorough search for mentions of names, topics etc to gather links and try to export comments on all those posts
There's about 20,000 comments in total in my file, gathered from 21 posts, from @couriermail, @ladbible, @theheraldsun, and Pauline Hanson's page.

Each of these comment sections were filled with incredible, aggressive abuse.
I used a word frequency counter to choose some of the most common terms of racist abuse, and then used a formula to determine how many comments feature these words at least once.

There are a lot. I include examples in the post. https://ketanjoshi.co/2020/07/30/the-pandemic-is-making-australian-media-racism-even-more-dangerous/
*racist and sexist that is
This intense, abusive reaction - filled with plenty of credible threats of violence, death threats, along with viciously misogynistic and racist abuse of the worst kind - is intentional.

This pool of emotion creates revenue for the outlets that feed and worsen it.
COVID19 provides a protective cover for this - they claim they're protecting public health, by triggering this tsunami of direct and extremely aggressive abuse as a punishment for breaching rules.

But it's applied solely to two young women of colour. https://twitter.com/KetanJ0/status/1289311372950401024
So it was stunning to me that, following the truly eye-opening lack of any introspection or reaction or criticism of what happened here, that the next week would feature loudly-declared admonishments of abuse directed at journalists, done without mention of this recent history.
Not only is this not mentioned, but if it *is* mentioned, they decide to erase you from their social media landscape. They're free to do that, but it's another symptom in what seems to be serious ailment.

I thought the Twitterati were the ones stuck in a bubble?
Of course, it's inevitable that many of the journalists who feature heavily in last week's calls to reduce abuse also feature heavily in another database I created: the media articles that brought a tsunami of threats, abuse and attacks raining down on @yassmin_a.
It's worth pausing to point out that - as a few others have, too - Daniel Andrews stans on Twitter have become pretty toxic. I tried criticising sending in armed forces and weaponry to deal with a COVID19 outbreak in public housing, and copped it too. It's getting bad.
Abuse of any kind is bad. But magnitude matters too. Source matters. Context matters. And all of these are being ignored because - what? It's actually good to target women of colour? It's fine for a media outlet to literally hurt Australian citizens for the purposes of profit?
There is never anything wrong with calling out abuse in your own mentions.

But you can't get shirty if we decide to call out the incredible waves of abuse *created* by the actions and decisions of your friends and colleagues, and sometimes, your own decisions.
The more its ignored, hand-waved away and blocked out of existence, the more frequently and the more loudly I'll keep saying it: racism is a problem in Australia media outlets, and it is getting orders of magnitude worse when paired with a pandemic.
/end
Appendix A: ages-old racist habits within the industry are getting worse when combined with the intensity and the anxiety of a pandemic, and failing to discuss or even acknowledge them also makes things worse
You can follow @KetanJ0.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:

By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.