Silly "controversy". Even Bitcoin block explorers often make mistakes with amounts. Look at the difference in "received" BTC between group A and group B:

Group A:
https://blockstream.info/address/1CyBaak5XjFQ9zGBUdrQeu5tkyuwdi8B4u
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1CyBaak5XjFQ9zGBUdrQeu5tkyuwdi8B4u

Group B:
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1CyBaak5XjFQ9zGBUdrQeu5tkyuwdi8B4u
https://live.blockcypher.com/btc/address/1CyBaak5XjFQ9zGBUdrQeu5tkyuwdi8B4u/ https://twitter.com/avsa/status/1292136418089865216
You would think the explorers in Group A are calculating it properly, because their brand is more trusted, but it's actually the latter that does a better job calculating the relevant amount. The point being that these web interfaces very often aren't reliable.
If someone is looking to block explorers or similar as their source of "truth", especially to make the case against Ethereum, then they don't understand blockchain. Bitcoin block explorers aren't reliable, why would Ethereum's ones be any different?
You can follow @CobraBitcoin.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled:
Those who think consciousness raising & movement building are disconnected, or even a distraction from electoral politics have not paid attention to the history of social change.In this thread, we
Read more
The 2020s will be known as the Remote Work decadeA few predictions of what is likely to emerge[ a thread ] Third Space: Office and Working from Home will
Read more
1/29: Have you ever had a concept explained to you that helps frame complex issues you’ve been wrestling with and opens your eyes to new possibilities? A concept that I
Read more
By continuing to use the site, you are consenting to the use of cookies as explained in our Cookie Policy to improve your experience.