Thread on Why believing in Human Evolution is Disbelief (Kufr) and Reasons why Darwin’s theory of Evolution is erroneous.
There is no scholar who has ever said it is permissible to believe that our father Adam had parents or that it is possible for humans not to have descended from Adam, or that Adam’s offspring were another species all together which would entail a biological impossibility.
1. Adam had parents, [Al-Araf:11]
This verse clearly provides a sequence of events which details that Adam must have been the first creation of Mankind as he was specified in the verse as the first creation in relation to the previous events before the Angles prostrating.
This verse clearly provides a sequence of events which details that Adam must have been the first creation of Mankind as he was specified in the verse as the first creation in relation to the previous events before the Angles prostrating.
[Al-Araf:11] Tafsir Ibn Kathir:
The exegesis of this verse exclaims “That God has made clear the rank of Mankind to the Honour of our Father Adam”
The exegesis of this verse exclaims “That God has made clear the rank of Mankind to the Honour of our Father Adam”
1. Adam Had Parents [Aal-‘imran:59]
Ibn Kathir Tasfir of this verse specifies that there is no room for interpretation, “God created Adam without father & mother but rather ‘created him from dust and said Be’ - Exegesis
Ibn Kathir Tasfir of this verse specifies that there is no room for interpretation, “God created Adam without father & mother but rather ‘created him from dust and said Be’ - Exegesis
2. We have not descended from Adam [Yaseen:60], This verse clearly states that we the children of Adam were told not to worship Satan, Many other verses are referring to us as the descendants of adam (Children Of Adam)
2. We are not the descendants of Adam,
Further verses disproving this claim:
[Al-Araf:26/27/31/35/172]
[Al-Isra’:70]
No exegesis on these verses claim other than this is directed to us, hence we are by definition the descendants of Adam.
Further verses disproving this claim:
[Al-Araf:26/27/31/35/172]
[Al-Isra’:70]
No exegesis on these verses claim other than this is directed to us, hence we are by definition the descendants of Adam.
3. Adam reproduced another species.
[Al-Ma'idah:27], Adam had kids this would biologically mean that they must have been of the same species as their father & mother holding that kinship, this fallacious claim would suggest that we are not Mankind [Al-A'raf:11]
[Al-Ma'idah:27], Adam had kids this would biologically mean that they must have been of the same species as their father & mother holding that kinship, this fallacious claim would suggest that we are not Mankind [Al-A'raf:11]
Sheikh Bin Baz states:
“The origin of Adam is the form that he is currently in and his origin is not an ape or anything else. Rather he is a complete, sound human being upon his [current] form. Saying that his origin is an ape is munkar and batil”
“The origin of Adam is the form that he is currently in and his origin is not an ape or anything else. Rather he is a complete, sound human being upon his [current] form. Saying that his origin is an ape is munkar and batil”
“rather it is appropriate to say this is kufr from the speaker of such a claim. What is apparent is that whoever says this while knowing what the Sharia says, he is a kafir because he is saying that Allah, His Messenger and Book of Allah is lying about the creation of Adam”
This thread covered by @TheGeekMuslim concludes the reasons why it is erroneous. https://twitter.com/TheGeekMuslim/status/1272950066999771136?s=20