Read on Twitter
Defining Whiteness & The Southern Cone: A Thread
Whenever we think about people from Latin America we usually imagine brown people so mixed that it is impossible to racially classify them. However, one of its regions stands out: the Southern Cone.
Whenever we think about people from Latin America we usually imagine brown people so mixed that it is impossible to racially classify them. However, one of its regions stands out: the Southern Cone.
I apologize in advance for any errors which I might have made while typing this. English is not my first language.
Before I start, I need to make a few clarifications. Whenever I say "White", I mean "European". White Americans can be called European Americans similarly to black Americans, who are called African Americans. Whites born outside of Europe are still European.
In other words, they are Europeans born outside of Europe who have developed a different culture. If we ever colonize Mars and Europeans migrate to there and end up staying there for generations, they will still be both earthlings and Europeans.
The only non-European aspect they may have is culture since American culture is different from European culture. However, both Europeans and Americans can naturalize themselves to each other's cultures. What matters the most is what you are physically, that is, your race: White.
In summary, race and nation are intertwined and naturalization can be done as long as the ethnicity is at least similar. Being European is more than just being born in Europe. The blood which flows in your veins matters more. Place of birth barely matters.
In fact, ethnicity can be seen in the very definition of the word "nation". Obviously, not all nations are made up by a single ethnic group or a group of similar ethnicities. Some nations were created by a variety of them, such as Brazil.
Race mixing happened in Brazil since it was discovered by us Europeans and there is no single "Brazilian ethnicity" as any ethnic group can be Brazilian. However, that is not the case with European nations.
A piece of paper or law means nothing. A law does not make anything right. A non-European born in Europe who has a European citizenship is not and will never ever be European no matter what since they lack the most important factor with the native population: common descent.
A German American, an American of German descent, is more German than an African born in Germany. If you disagree with any of the statements which I have made, then stop reading this and leave. This thread is only for racially aware people. I shall move on now.
Well, first of all we need to define what being "White" is. White people are people with predominantly White DNA, which makes them have white skin, certain bone structures and a variety of both hair and eye colors. We can also separate them in subracial goups.
The problem is that there is no consensus to when someone becomes or ceases to be White, not even in the pro-White community. In fact, some of us even think that certain nations should no longer be considered White, such as Italy.
Let us take the color spectrum as an example. Blue becomes green at some point. However, can we actually say exactly when blue becomes green? If we took that gap of transition and showed it to different people and asked them what the color was, we would get different replies.
It is obvious that both blue and green exist, but some colors between them look more green than blue or more blue than green. The exact same can be said about any other color and every human race.
I am sure you must have heard about our dear friend Varg. We actually follow each other here on Twitter and I believe he receives a lot of unnecessary hate. I believe people get too offended by what he says. I also follow people who openly despise him.
I do not think that Varg is a bad person and I am not here to attack or defend him. I will simply tell you his view on race since a sizable percentage of our community seems to have it. I enjoy the content he makes and I am very, very open-minded.
Varg thinks that the Nordic race is the only race which is native to Europe and that every European with non-Nordic traits is a product of admixture with non-Europeans in the past. We call this "Nordicism", although I am not sure if Varg agrees with this term.
For Varg, dark features such as brown hair and brown eyes are non-European admixture. However, unlike what some people say, Varg does not consider every European with those dark features a non-European.
He simply views them as less European than Nordics since they have admixture, but they are still European enough to him. I do not think he would consider George Rockwell or Oswald Mosley non-European because of their dark features.
I am no expert on genetics or anthropology, so I am not going to try to disprove Varg's views, the Out of Africa Theory or anything else. I just do not have enough knowledge to talk about it. I have a more simplistic, but practical view on race.
Obviously, Italy and the rest of Southern Europe have some questionable individuals even if Varg is wrong as some of them would not stand out in a crowd of Middle Easterners, who are non-White. I classify those people as too mixed to be considered Europeans.
Even if the Out of Africa Theory is wrong, the most Nordic man in the most remote village in Norway has at some point in his lineage non-European ancestry. There is no such thing as a "pure White", but some are certainly more White than others.
There is no such thing as a European whose ancestors were all born in Europe and had no contact whatsoever with non-Europeans. Literally every single one of us has non-European ancestry at some point, but it simply becomes irrelevant once it is small enough.
What I am trying to say is that this specific Norwegian man is very blue and that an Italian with olive skin, dark hair and dark eyes who stands out in a crowd of Arabs is greenish blue, but still blue.
We would not be having this conversation if the Nordicist view did not exist. I simply stated that to show you that my view on race works even if Nordicists are right. Southern Europeans are still European enough to be Europeans.
Do not argue with me about Nordicism. Argue about it with actual Nordicists who study the subject. I am not here to disprove anyone. I am here to share my view on race and I think that my view is the most practical one. I believe we can work with it.
Varg himself has commented on some of my tweets. Perhaps he will comment on this one as well, which would bring a lot of his followers to here. Feel free to discuss Nordicism as you want here, but please keep it civilized. Just do not kill each other.
But let us get to the point. When does someone become White? How much White DNA must you have to be considered White? My answer is very practical: if everyone up to your grandparents are White, then you are White enough.
It is not like you are going to have a non-White child with another White if you have a non-White ancestor from five generations ago or so. This non-White admixture becomes irrelevant at some point and it would gradually disappear.
Nevertheless, we do have exceptions. Technically, a person born from a mixed race couple could look very much like the race with recessive traits. I believe that sometimes DNA must trump appearance. You are certainly not White if your parents are of different races.
However, self-identification and appearance based on close descent should be more than enough to classify someone as White enough. We should seek purity and an ideal, like the Nordic ideal, but we must also be realistic.
No one is the human incarnation of a perfect Greek statue. We should work with what we have and then seek purity once we have stability. Basically, I believe we have more important problems to solve and that we should worry about DNA tests and purity later.
What I am saying is that throughout history Whites have always fought each other. Portugal, Spain, France, England, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Russia and other European nations have had empires which killed mostly other Whites. We need unity right now.
If we want our race to survive, we must overcome our differences, including religious and racial differences. We are not going to save our nations if we are not united. We should worry about racial subgroups of the White race or Nordicism later.
For the record, I am French and I am somewhere between a Nordic and a Mediterranean. My skin is fair, my hair is brown and my eyes are a mixture of green and brown. Technically, they are hazel. Sometimes they look more green than brown or more brown than green.
I believe my view on race is practical and simple. I want all subgroups of our great race to survive "diversity" and globalism, regardless if some might be more White than others. Hopefully, you have understood my stance on this matter. I will move on now.
The Southern Cone is a name given by geographers to the region made by Argentina, Chile, Uruguay, Paraguay and Brazil due to their cultural and economical similarities. However, some areas might not be included depending on what you are talking about.
This happens because the definition includes many aspects, like high Human Development Index, which many Brazilian states and Paraguay lack. However, I am only going to talk about what truly matters to us: race.
When Latin America was discovered by Europeans, Spain and Portugal sent only men to colonize it. The men would then race mix with the natives due to the lack of White women. White women would only come generations later when the region was more developed.
This did not happen in Anglo-Saxon America because entire families came since the beginning. This is why Anglo-Saxon America became a White region and Latin America a mixed race region, specially Central America.
However, this did not happen at all in the Southern Cone, specially in Argentina, Uruguay and Southern Brazil. It was basically the last area to be colonized and there were not that many natives there. Slavery did not happen in a large scale, too.
Therefore, whatever admixture they might have is going to be irrelevant most of time. If you put them in their countries of descent, they do not stand out. Yes, they are less European than us because of their admixture, but they are still Europeans.
Most of the Whites there have fair skin, dark hair, dark eyes and average stature. I know this because my girlfriend is from there and I have been to those countries. They could easily fit in France or Northern Italy, for an example.
Some even have more Nordic features or straight up do not have Indigenous admixture (very few have African admixture) since they descend only from Europeans who came to those countries during the First World War, the Second World War and the Russian Revolution.
While the Southern Cone is made by five countries, I will mostly talk about Paraguay and Brazil since they are the most racially diverse countries of the region. Also, Brazil is an amazing country to study race since it shows how awful a multiracial and multicultural nation is.
Brazil is probably the saddest case since you have slums filled with brown people in its North, Northeast and Southeast. However, its Southern states have a population which is over 80% White. It actually snows in certain parts of Southern Brazil, too.
Brazil also has the biggest racial problem. Let us take this brown Brazilian girl as an example. Here she says she does not follow Whites with braids or samurai bun hairstyles since it is cultural appropriation. She also says she will be xenophobic towards Southerners.
Can you imagine the Brazilian media reaction if the races were reversed? Southerners also have their separatist movement, which is the strongest one in Brazil. The South is simply too culturally, racially and economically different from the rest of the country.
Brazil has the same problems as the United States of America. Its black and brown regions are unproductive and require a lot of tax money from White regions to survive. The blacks and browns also act entitled and keep voting for the same policies that destroyed their regions.
Brazil is an actual melting pot. Too many cultures, religions and races living together. It is proof that multiculturalism only leads to chaos. Brazil's government is also too big, bureaucratic and useless. The political situation there is absolute chaos.
Here you can see what Brazil would look like if every separatist movement succeeded. As you can see, the Whites from the South are not the only ones who want separation. Brazil has no future as a nation of completely different people.
It is important to point out that race is not the primary factor behind Southern separatism. While their leader might be a German Brazilian, many people within the movement are not White. Economical reasons are what drive their separatism.
Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina, two Southern Brazilian states, were actually independent nations at one point in time and were actually recognized by both Uruguay and Argentina for some time. Southern separatism is not new to Brazil.
The first image shows the flag of the Riograndense Republic, which existed for over ten years. It is also called the Piratini Republic. The second image shows a painting of its first president: Bento Gonçalves.
The first image shows the flag of the Juliana Republic, which existed for less than one year. The second image shows a painting of its first and only president: David Martins.
Brazil shows us how a multiracial and multicultural nation is a hellhole. It shows what White countries will become in the future if things keep going the way they are. We must learn from the situation in Brazil and do everything in our power to not let it happen to us.
Let us talk specifically about demographics now. Everything which will be said here refers to studies done around 2010, so they are certainly a little different by now. However, these countries still have a significant White population. These are self-declarations, too.
Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina, which are two Southern Brazilian states, have a population which is over 80% White. Paraná, the other Southern Brazilian state, has a population which is over 70% White. Other Brazilian states have a sizable White population as well.
Both Argentina and Uruguay have a population which is over 80% White. However, some studies that are not a compilation of self-declarations and have somewhat of a Nordicist view tell us that Argentina's population is a little over 50% White, which is still a sizable amount.
Chile's population is a little over 50% White and most of them are found in Southern Chile. The least White of the countries of the Southern Cone is Paraguay. The reason as to why Paraguay is so mixed race brings to our next topic: the Paraguayan War.
The Paraguayan War is never talked about in schools outside of South America for obvious reasons. It happned in 1864 and ended in 1870. Imperial Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina fought against Paraguay in a bloody war which devastated Paraguay and killed a lot of its male adults.
After the war, there were four women to one man in Paraguay. In regions greatly affected by the war, there were twenty women to one man. After winning, the Brazilian army had the developed a sense of unity. This unity made the Brazilian military proclaim the republic.
Paraguay was completely destroyed and basically only women, children, and Indigenous people were left. That is why Paraguay is a poor and mixed race country. The war was mostly fought over geographical reasons since Paraguay wanted access to the sea.
I absolutely hate to admit this as a White Nationalist, but we Whites slaughtered each other in Paraguay just like we did in Europe many, many times. Blacks were sent to die first, though. That is one of the reasons as to why the the Southern Cone has nearly no blacks.
It is also interesting to point out the image of the gaucho or gaúcho. The gaucho is the national symbol of Argentina, Uruguay, some of Paraguay and Southern Brazil: a skilled horseman and craftsman who roams the plains.
Obviously, the original gaucho was mixed race. However, a gaucho can have any race. The people shown in the beginning of this thread are both gauchos, but they look pretty White to me, specially the woman with her Nordic traits: blonde hair and blue eyes.
Here you can see some photos of gauchos. I believe we call agree that the last two look pretty White. The fourth one is actually Emperor Pedro II of Brazil in a tradicional gaucho outfit.
We can even talk about the gauchos' drink: the mate. It has other names as well, such as maté, chimarrão and cimarrón. It is made by soaking dried leaves of the yerba mate plant in hot water and is served with a metal straw in a container made from calabash gourd.
We can also talk about churrasco, which is the Portuguese and Spanish name for beef or grilled meat more generally. It is a prominent feature in the cuisine of Brazil, Uruguay and Argentina. My girlfriend eats it every weekend, but I do not eat it since I am a vegetarian.
We have to understand White countries need immigrants no matter what. We are obviously not going to force our women to have White children. We simply have been receiving the worst immigrants possible.
Most of them are "refugees", who are in fact economic migrants, that come from Africa and the Middle East. They are neither from our race nor do they have our cultural values. However, most people from the Southern Cone fit our requirements.
As I have said, they are not as European as we are. However, that should not matter at all since most of them look like us and could easily integrate in our nations. We do need immigrants, but we need the right ones.
My point is that those Whites from the Southern Cone are European as well and they are not going to pollute our gene pool if they have children with us. Any amount of admixture they have is irrelevant and it would gradually disappear in future generations.
However, if I were to choose migrants to receive, I would choose Whites from Africa. Whites in Africa, specially South Africans, are literally being tortured and then murdered. I think it is obvious that we should prioritize them instead of White South Americans.
It should also be said that there are more White regions across Latin America, but the Southern Cone simply gets more recognition due to its size. I might talk about other White regions in the future.
Thank you for reading.
Thank you for reading.
